- Ulama Muda UMNO Sokong Injil Bahasa Melayu (tapi tolak Syiah)
- A commenter at People's Parliament rebuts MCLM Prez pretty well
- DAP in Sri Aman
- TBH's family members undergo psychiatric interview
- Karpal receives a rousing welcome in Miri
- Pembela: 'Don't politicise Al Kitab issue'
- RPK's TV interview heavily spinned, says MCLM
- DAP's campaign goes on despite rain
- BN Show us …….
- This MCLM wants to be a father figure to the Opposition...
- (Gambar) Ceramah Hari Terakhir Pakatan Rakyat
- Jatuhkan Taib. Jatuhkan Najib. Jatuhkan BN
- Epistle To The Church In Malaysia — By Thomas Lee Seng Hock.
- OMEGA REVELATIONS: Will the real old dogs please stand up
- OMEGA REVELATIONS: Haris Ibrahim spinning like a top trying to defend RPK
- (Gambar) Ceramah Pakatan Rakyat Kuching Telah Mencecah 30,000 Orang
- Malaysian Main Stream Media is the Worst Public Enemy
- RPK: I’M THESODOMY3 HERO MY ASSHOLE THEY HAVE ENLARGED NOW YOU CAN CALL RPK SHIT FOOLTHE SECRET SERVICE SHARES SECRETS
- The Unending Haunt of Altantuya
- BE A TAG HEUER...
Posted: 15 Apr 2011 02:58 PM PDT
NOTA EDITOR: Nampaknya Ulama Muda UMNO sudah menyokong Injil Melayu yang mengandungi ribuan perkataan Allah di dalamnya.
Use of Bahasa Bible is fine, says ulama
Posted: 15 Apr 2011 11:22 AM PDT
YES, I surfed the Internet late into the still of the Seremban night; I visited harisibrahim.wordpress.com's too -- just to listen from the horse's mouth how he put up his defence of his idol, RPK, also often a partner-in-shenanigans blatantly demonstrated during Zaid Ibrahim's campaign to become Deputy President of Parti Keadilan Rakyat late last year.
I hope the Commenter named Don Ricardo won't mind my copying his well-articulated views in rebutting the People's Parliament and MCLM mover's stance in defending his idol RPK. Yes, de Prez is subservient to de Chairman in MCLM -- furthermore, RPK is from Royalty what!
********************************** Extract of Don Ricardo's starts here:~~ YL, Desi with grateful acknowledgement from Seremban.
Don Ricardo Alhambra Says:
April 15, 2011 at 7:33 pm
MCLM made a "press conference" to defend RPK today.
I wish to refute the things that Haris said in the "press conference":
1. Haris said: "the mainstream media… presented Raja Petra's interview completely out of context", "This interview was done in February. RPK just told me that this morning".
My response — The few long sentences that RPK spoke, even if shown separately, has enough context for us to understand what he meant. We can read. We are not that stupid such that we always won't "get the context". What RPK said is out there in black and white, even if it's the full thing. So who are you trying to fool?
Also, RPK rarely gets interviewed by any major news media. So if he got interviewed by something as big as TV3, why he only told you this morning only?
2. Haris said: "I challenge TV3 to put up the full, unedited video of the interview on YouTube or whatever medium (on the Internet)".
My response — Knock, knock! Hello Haris! You of all people should know that this is TV3, one of UMNO's mouthpieces! Challenge to put up full video? Forget it! As if they're gonna listen to you. It's too late. It's also besides the point. The damage is done. The objective has been accomplished.
3. Haris said: "that no one in MCLM was aware that RPK had done the interview, nor could he give a definite answer on the latter's motives for agreeing to speak with TV3. Haris, however, rubbished talk that Raja Petra, who is also MCLM chairperson, had been "coerced"".
My response — Wow, your best friend left you in the dark about such a big interview with such a big media outlet! Some best friend! You said here that you don't know what RPK's motive was. It could be a "mistake" just as it could be RPK doing "BN a favour so BN will do him a favour". How can you say so confidently say RPK was not "coerced" when you just admitted that you are uncertain about RPK's motive? Are you taking us for a ride, Haris? We request that you please be honest with us.
4. Haris said: "Haris also brushed aside claims that Raja Petra was paid to do the TV3 interview".
My response — Haris, how do you know? You just said you don't know the reason why RPK did the interview. How come you can confidently say RPK was not paid in any way? How would you ever know? I know RPK is your "best friend", but even best friends can hide things from each other. There is just no way you can confirm that RPK didn't take a single sen. So can you please stop clutching straws to defend RPK and be more less biased please?
5. Haris said: ""If you listen carefully, Raja Petra said, 'Saya tidak lagi terima cerita itu, sebab saya rasa mungkin mustahil kut'. He is saying that 'I do not yet believe this story, because it's quite incredible'.When you read the Star, they quoted him as saying, 'I no longer accept the story. I think it's quite impossible'. The mainstream media has distorted (his statement)."
My response — Hello Haris! There is no distortion there also! That is an exact and accurate translation from BM to BI! What "distortion" are you talking about, Haris? Why does it appear you are so desperate to defend RPK on his behalf?
6. Haris said: "Haris added that the mainstream media had insinuated that Raja Petra drew the information that he put down on his statutory declaration in 2008 from several sources, when in fact it only came from one source – Nik Azmi Nik Daud, a former aide to Gua Musang MP Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah. Haris said Raja Petra had then contacted blogger Din Merican…"
My response — Haris, why name names in an interview with such a dirty mainstream media? Is RPK trying to detonate Pakatan Rakyat and PKR by doing this? It's just a TV interview, not a confidential police statement. So why whistleblow your own informer? All this makes us think that RPK is trying to "pretend" that this is all mainstream media "spin" but in reality, RPK very cleverly has achieved his purpose in terms of altering "perception". He has succeeded in tarnishing Pakatan. He has also forever tarnished his reputation as a "defender of the rakyat".
7. Haris said: "while there is no denying Raja Petra had been critical of Anwar and the opposition in the TV3 interview, he stressed that it is nothing that the outspoken blogger hasn't said before."
My response — Hello, it's the perception strategy again. Even if he has attacked Anwar Ibrahim so many times before, why must RPK give Barisan Nasional so much ammunition on a gold platter like this to use on such a wonderful television media to be aired left and right, night and day on TV? Something cannot be right.
Also, in my view:
*RPK is like a bull in a china shop, he just goes ramming everywhere, and he uses this tactic to taint Pakatan Rakyat and pretends "that's just his style". We don't by it.
*RPK is a big talker, more of a big talker than a doer for most of the while, and people who talk like a hero are usually suspicious characters who screw us up in the end.
*RPK is no god. He relies on the rakyat's power so tell him not to fool us around. Who asked him to given an interview to TV3? If he is such a big talker and so damn smart, who asked him to talk to TV3? This is the major mystery and the key to RPK joining the devil's side.
*We should also listen other people's views to understand RPK, not just Haris's views alone. There is a damning Letter To The Editor in Malaysiakini that was just published, which will tell you who RPK really is. Check this out: http://malaysiakini.com/letters/161443.
After reading this Malaysiakini bombshell letter and Haris's statement about RPK, make up your minds about RPK.
Let us decide for ourselves whether to trust RPK or not.
Also, RPK is no god. I don't want to have faith in him.
I also don't want to give my full faith to MCLM.
I will only give my faith to the truth, to justice, to real reform, to real friendship with the rakyat.
If MCLM achieves this, then good. If Pakatan achieves this, then good.
But no one should ask us, the rakyat, to give blind faith to any one.
Haris, you should have just told us "think and use your hearts to decide" rather than ask us to blindly "keep the faith".
I wish you were more objective and impartial, Haris.
Posted: 15 Apr 2011 08:59 AM PDT
Posted: 15 Apr 2011 04:52 AM PDT
Posted: 15 Apr 2011 04:33 AM PDT
Posted: 15 Apr 2011 04:05 AM PDT
Posted: 15 Apr 2011 03:48 AM PDT
Posted: 15 Apr 2011 03:17 AM PDT
Posted: 15 Apr 2011 09:11 AM PDT
Posted: 15 Apr 2011 09:09 AM PDT
Its President was speaking on April 15, two weeks too late for the best 2011's April Fool's joke!
Just launched less than a year ago, MCLM's self-anointed President Haris Ibrahim says his supra-governing body called Malaysian Civil Liberties Movement, initially flagged off as a Third Force, then a cndiadtes' selection body to the Pakatan Rakyat, then an Auditor of all Parliamentarians, you name its chameleonic forms, dear EsteemedReaders!, now MCLM wants to be a "father" figure to the Opposition parties. Hey Haris, DAP and PAS are in their fifties quite close to your age and Raja Petra's while PKR under Anwar Ibrahim is in its teens of 12 or 13 years, but Anwar has been an activist starting as ABIM chief, then as a politician, for at least four decades!...).
Hey. why don't you go "fly a kite" in the UK or Australia -- join thy Chairmanlah well endowed by some philanthropist's funds -- whose name I won't even deem worth while mentioning in full here because he has fooled enough Malaysians longing for a two-party/coalition system for along time. As I said about six months ago, MCLM's only clear-cut role is to put spanners into the wheel of Pakatan Rakyat now running quite smoothly except for some "Trojan horses" who entered PKR house as guests and tried to burn the house down (Thank the good Lord our God who's smarter than Zaid Ibrahim, John Soh CW and Jeffrey Kitingan and all their cronies combined ..., they did NOT succeed! ~~ Amen).
Partial extract from the Malaysian Insider's report:
MCLM sees itself a father figure to Opposition parties
By Melissa Chi
April 15, 2011
MCLM president Haris Ibrahim said the organisation criticises the Opposition in the hope that it will bring about improvements. — file pic
KUALA LUMPUR, April 15 — Fledgling group Malaysian Civil Liberties Movement (MCLM) justified its criticisms of Opposition parties and its leaders, saying today it was only hoping to see them improve and did not wish to discredit them.
MCLM president Haris Ibrahim stressed they wanted to see Opposition parties improve in the future when commenting on the outrage over the organisation chairman Raja Petra Kamarudin's criticism of opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim that was broadcast by the pro-government TV3 television station.
"We do this almost like how a father would chastise a child whom he loves because you see something wrong and you set it right.
"If you go through this entire video clip, you will not find once where Raja Petra says Anwar has lost complete credibility. He was critical over efforts by the Opposition to form a shadow Cabinet, as he has said several times before in his blog," Haris told reporters at the organisation's headquarters here.
The MCLM was formed last October in London.
(Go read the report in full at themalaysianinsider.com!)
I will now just copy six samples of the comments to this report sighted just before midnight Friday, the close of campaigning in the Sarawak state elections. Thanks a million MI! ENJOY!-- YL, Desi
Tahir Nisa · 2 hours ago
Whether spinned or not. It was a pure stupid action by RPK to agree to be interviewed by TV3, when it was this same guy (RPK) that categorised mainstream media's as unethical and spinners. Now it what circumstances did you RPK agree to be interviewed by TV3 and don't tell us here in Malaysia that it is none of our business on who interviews you. Bear in mind RPK you partly survive with money donated/paid by fellow Malaysians that oppose BN and its cronies....and if you had forgotten RPK, TV3 is one of them (cronies of BN).
bonnie · 4 hours ago
This must be the joke of the century. RPK and MCLM by association is worse than Mr Anwar Ibrahim. Talk about hypocrisy, lies, deception, arrogance, and ambitions. Your image and reputation now is so tarnished one sees u as no more than a pile of cow crap. Stinking and yucky and totally undesired. At least AI did not betrayed anyone or any principle.
michealvernon · 3 hours ago
Be careful of MCLM. Two turncoats , RPK and Zaid, are prominient members of this organisation. Please folks read between the lines. The MCLM is a TROJAN HORSE which will destroy the opposition. Like a Trojan virus which infects the computer, the MCLM has been planted by "you know who", to destroy the opposition.
justlee · 3 hours ago
Whatever MCLM says here in mitigation is inconsequential.Harm has already been done to opposition efforts and a big boost given to the BN.A lot of questions are in readers' minds like why your chairman chose this timing to make his "revelations" and the use of mainstream media knowing very well they will twist,turn and spin every word he says.Do you really think readers will believe you or the opposition will accept such a two timing father ?
Gerard Samuel Vijayan Lourdesamy · 3 hours ago
Harris, since when did the MCLM become the "father" figure for the Opposition parties in Malaysia? Most of these parties were formed well before MCLM. A father does not chastise his children in public when he is fully aware that his comments or actions would be distorted. RPK's interview with TV3 was the height of stupidity. Since when did the mainstream media become the friend of civil society? If RPK has a bone to pick with Anwar do it elsewhere and some other time. If he wants to cut a deal with Najib and return home, so be it. But RPK should not try to make fools of the rest of us. He is not that smart.
menj · 2 hours ago
With people like Haris Ibrahim heading MCLM, who needs enemies?
DESIDERATA: Yes, dear MENJ -- I had also written an article last October I reprised two days ago titled: "With friends like RPK and Haris Ibrahim, PKR doesn't need enemies"!
Posted: 15 Apr 2011 09:03 AM PDT
Ceramah Gergasi Hari Terakhir Pakatan Rakyat!
Sibu - 20,000 orang
Miri - 25,000 orang
Kuching - 30,000 orang
RM36,736 donation in Miri!!!
DUN Sarawak = 71 seats
Simple Majority = 36 seats
1/3 = 24 Seats
Result: starting from 8pm onwards...
Tips untuk mengundi, sila layari: http://vote4malaysia.blogspot.com/
[ADS] Terima Email Dan Dapatkan $$$ Setiap Kali Membacanya !!!
[ADS] Malaysia Online Contest, Promotion & Earning Blog!!!
Posted: 15 Apr 2011 08:20 AM PDT
Sekiranya BN terus menang dengan 2/3 besok, maka Taib Mahmud akan terus memerintah Sarawak sehingga pilihanraya seterusnya. Tiada sebab beliau berundur kerana jelas rakyat masih memberi sokongan kepada beliau dgn majoriti 2/3.
Namun, kalau BN kalah besok, ertinya Pak Taib akan tersunggkur. Maka, Sarawak akan mendapat kerajaan dan Ketua Menteri yang baru.
Ia juga bererti Sarawak bukan negeri selamat untuk BN. Ia berpotensi untuk menyebabkan Barisan Nasional itu sendiri tersunggkur menyembah bumi.
Maka, haruslah semua pengundi Sarawak keluar mengundi besok dan mengundi Pakatan Rakyat demi masa depan Malaysia dan anak cucu kita.
UNDILAH PAKATAN RAKYAT
Posted: 15 Apr 2011 07:57 AM PDT
Dear sisters and brothers in the faith,
Greetings in the name of our beloved Saviour and Lord Jesus Christ. His love, grace, peace, joy and blessings be upon all of you who love, honour and obey him.
I write this open letter as a fellow believer and as a humble servant of the Almighty God to make a clarion call to my sisters and brothers in the faith to unite in solidarity of vision and mission to bring about a moral and spiritual transformation of our beloved nation, by our individual prayers and united corporate intercession, and through our vocal articulation and visible demonstration of our life and faith beyond the walls of our comfort zone within our churches. The time has come for us to wake up from our spiritual slumber, and stand up, without fear or favour, and be counted for the Lord Jesus.
Most, if not all, of you are surely aware and concerned that our beloved country is currently going through a very critical and uncertain time, during which various delicate and sensitive matters are being exploited and abused by the evil forces out to destroy the peaceful and harmonious co-existence of our multi-racial, multi-religious, multi-cultural, multi-ideological and multi-lingual nation. It is during such a time as this that we as followers of the Lord Jesus Christ need to go on our knees before the throne of grace to seek forgiveness, mercy and divine intervention to save our nation from disintegration and destruction.
The church and state
One of the most heretical deceptions that the Christian community has been infused with by misguided western missionaries is the so-called separation of the church and state, meaning that Christians should not be involved in matters of the state, or take any stand on political issues. This teaching is based on a distorted exegesis of the statement by the Lord Jesus on the issue of paying tax: "Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's" (Matthew 22:21).
The traditional church community has always used this statement to mark a demarcation between what is supposed to be "spiritual" or sacred, and what is considered "secular" or worldly. Hence, a broad boundary exists today between the church and the world outside its walls, with Christians having two distinct spheres of lifestyle.
Such a compartmentalisation of life into "spiritual" and "secular" is certainly bad theology, and is, in fact, contrary to the biblical doctrine of man with its emphasis on the whole person, with the involvement in the whole of life in every area and sphere of life and thoughts. Unfortunately, many Malaysian pastors and church leaders still have such misconceived and mislaid socio-political conscience, and are even paranoid over anything political. Many are also living in fear and trembling of such harsh and draconian laws like the Internal Security Act (ISA), which provides for indiscriminate detention with trial.
Hence, there is much reluctance of the part of the pastors and church leaders to preach, teach and articulate on socio-economic and political matters, even though the Bible is full of such stories and teachings of social ethical values and practices. For example, the story of the Exodus in the Old Testament is a narration of a political liberation movement led by Moses to free the Hebrew slaves from the despotic Pharaoh of Egypt. In the New Testament, the beheading of John the Baptist was the result of the prophet's moral-political campaign against the immorality in high places. The Lord Jesus himself was crucified for his challenge to the corrupt religious leaders and the oppressive Roman authorities.
In the Malaysian Christian community, there are many, especially pastors and church leaders, who are sincere and anxious to preserve and protect the fundamental faith without compromise and condensation, and are faithful and obedient to strive for the fulfilment of the Great Commission of our Lord Jesus. However, due to the shallow theological education they received at local seminaries, which are mere clones of the western seminaries, many of them have developed unbalanced and narrow views and attitudes, especially in relation to socio-economic and political matters. This is why many pastors and church leaders are perceived as docile and submissive, and are easily frightened, bullied or placated by the bureaucracy outside the church. This can also be observed when a VIP government personality visits their church. They dress up in their formal best and get so excited like little children getting gifts from Santa Claus.
And over the years till even now, the pastors and church leaders who represent the Christian community in negotiations with the governmental authorities over matters of dispute have used the so-called soft diplomatic approach, meeting behind closed doors, without press coverage, although the issues are of public interest and concern. However, all these meetings seemed to end with meaningless conclusions, with the pastors and church leaders apparently at a loss over what had actually transpired, and what had been pledged, since all the so-called agreements were never ever implemented.
I expect the so-called instant 10-point plan proposed by the federal government to resolve the current controversy over the Bahasa Malaysia version of the Bible to similarly become a political mirage that will disappear as soon as the current Sarawak state election and the impending 13th general election are over. Basically, the 10-point plan, amazingly formulated instantly within a few days, is an expedient tool to deal with the impounding of the Bahasa Malaysia Bible, to provide a convenient political diversion for the Sarawak state election. The pastors and church leaders who agree to endorse such an illusive and delusive "solution" to the Bahasa Malaysia Bible controversy certainly lack wisdom and are short-sighted. Thankfully, the Christian Federation of Malaysia (CFM) chairman Bishop Ng Moon Hing is a wise leader who is able to discern the real situation. He made the following media statement on the issue:
"The 10-point solution deals with the impounding of the Alkitab but not with the prohibition of publications containing the word 'Allah'. The root cause of the problem of the impounding of the Alkitab lies in the following:
(a) The 1982 prohibition of the Alkitab and the 1983 prohibition of the Perjanjian Baru under the Internal Security Act 1960 (ISA) on the grounds that the Alkitab is prejudicial to national interest and the security of Malaysia.
(b) The 1986 administrative order prohibiting the use of the term 'Allah' in Christian publications on the grounds of public order and prevention of misunderstanding between Muslims and Christians.
(c) The Garis Panduan of the Bahagian Kawalan Penerbitan dan Teks Al-Quran of the Ministry of Home Affairs prohibiting the use of the word 'Allah'.
In this regard we refer to item 9 of the 10-point solution which reiterates the government's commitment to address religious issues. The government, therefore, should take immediate steps to remove the root causes by revoking the orders made under the ISA and the administrative order and to amend the Garis Panduan to remove the prohibition.
The 'one country two policies' approach is confusing and unacceptable. We look forward to working with the government to address other long-standing issues affecting the Christian community including the relevant provisions in the state enactments."
Syabas, Bishop Ng. We stand firmly in support of your stand.
Time to take a firm stand
At such a time as this when our nation is immersed in such serious controversies involving the question of human, civil and constitutional rights of Christians to freely profess, practise, promote, and propagate our faith without constraints and restraints, Christians of all denominations and differing theological inclinations should stand in solidarity to preserve and protect our rights from being diluted, deprived, and severely undermined.
There is also the increasingly dangerous moral decline infesting the soul of our nation, with corruption, cronyism, nepotism, and immorality fast becoming a way of life among some of the elites of the nation.
English historian Edward Gibbon, in his famous six-volume "The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire", has shown us that it was the immoral behaviour of the Roman emperors, politicians and rich people that led to the decay and eventual fall of the Roman Empire.
According to Gibbon, the Roman Empire succumbed to external invasions because of the gradual loss of moral values and virtue among its political leaders, who were enjoying the luxurious comfortable life and lifestyle, with nary a concern about the country, its future, and posterity. The emperors and the political leaders were immoral, corrupt, weak and lazy. They outsourced their responsibilities and duties to develop and defend their nation to foreign migrants, who later became so numerous that they were able to overrun the country and take control of it.
If we are not to go the way of the Romans, surely we need to protect our children and progenies from the current onslaught of the destabilising and destructive sensually self-indulgent hedonistic culture invading our nation from the West, transmitted directly to our homes via the globalwide cyber network connection and by satellite television.
The horror of such a moral incursion into our society should not be simply dismissed as scaremongering, or as spreading ominous reports or rumours of impending disaster.
The moral decay is fast descending upon us. Truth, righteousness, justice, fairness, love, equality and basic human rights are being compromised too. Then there are the racists with their insensitive, offensive and outrageous attitude and actions. The horror of such a scenario cannot be ignore, and we need to act fast to arrest the increasingly fast moral decline in our nation.
Need for electoral revolution
Hence, we need to initiate an electoral revolution, by going all out to vote en bloc for candidates who have impeccable integrity, blameless character, irreproachable moral and virtuous immaculate lifestyle.
As Christians constitute 10 per cent of the nation's population, and nearly 45 per cent of the Sarawak population, we are a formidable force with tremendous electoral clout to bring about a transformation of the political landscape in our nation. We should exercise our civil and constitutional right to vote for the best possible candidates to lead our state and nation.
The fate of our nation and the future of our children are in our hands. We must not waste this opportune kairos time to bring about a moral transformation in our nation, so that righteousness will exalt our nation (Proverb 14:34).
As we pray the Lord's Prayer, saying "Your kingdom come, your will be done on earth as it is in heaven" (Matthew 6:19), let us allow the Lord to do his will through us when we exercise our right to vote.
May God bless all you real good, and may he also look favourably upon our homeland and bless it with peace, harmony, and prosperity.
Your servant in the service of the Lord Jesus Christ.
Posted: 15 Apr 2011 07:02 AM PDT
This is the disrespectful banner that they Opposition and their crass politics are putting up on Kuching roadsides, they rudely compare the Chief Minister and some senior members of the state assembly as asuk tua or old dogs....
Well, let us look at some of the old dogs in Pakatan, or as my friend likes to say it, Babi tua
Posted: 15 Apr 2011 06:33 AM PDT
There are those who believe so completely in something that even if they see clear as a day a white ball, they will still say it is a purple octopus.
It seems that this is the case with Haris Ibrahim and Raja Petra....
Haris is so desperate to defend RPK that he said the blogger's interview has been chopped up to misrepresent the Opposition's premier mouthpiece.
I am to privy to what has transpired between RPK and Datuk Ashraf Abdullah of TV3 and how long the interview actually lasted but all I wan to say is that RPK has access to the internet and/or has access to a telephone and can tell one of his MalaysiaToday writers to rebut
In fact he also gave a 13-minute interview to Radio Australia today, giving his assessment of what the Sarawak state election has to offer to the Opposition, and not even once did he say that his interview was edited to misrepresent him
RPK's interview with Radio Australia is HERE
So I guess what I am saying is this, it is time to start thinking and and examine the evidence in hand rather than just listening to one side of the story
In case you missed it, part one of RPK's interview with TV3 is here
Posted: 15 Apr 2011 06:31 AM PDT
Menurut laporan merdeka review, Ceramah Pakatan Rakyat di Kuching kini mencecah 30,000 orang. Ramai yang berpakaian warna merah yang menandakan gelombang perubahan.
Menurut SPR, keputusan pilihanraya negeri Sarawak akan diketahui mulai jam 8 malam sehingga jam 11 malam.
Informasi DUN Sarawak:
Jumlah Kerusi: 71
Simple Majority : 36
Target PR: 24 (1/3)
Tips untuk mengundi, sila layari: http://vote4malaysia.blogspot.com/
[ADS] Terima Email Dan Dapatkan $$$ Setiap Kali Membacanya !!!
[ADS] Malaysia Online Contest, Promotion & Earning Blog!!!
Posted: 15 Apr 2011 06:28 AM PDT
Posted: 15 Apr 2011 06:04 AM PDT
OUR UMNO RESPONSE TO A SCANDALOUS MESS IS NEAT AND CATEGORISED. CASH AND SEX ARE THE NORTH AND SOUTH POLE OF MASS INTEREST, EACH WITH A SPRAWLING MAGNETIC FIELD. WE DIVIDE THE HEMISPHERES WITH THE EQUATOR OF LOGIC. CASH AND CORRUPTION ARE THE PRESERVE OF POLITICS. SEX IS THE PROVINCE OF GLAMOUR. WE REFUSE TO RECOGNISE ANY CROSS-OVEREVIDENCE.
Meanwhile, enjoy this wonderful rendition of I Will Always Love You from Ziana Zain. Rosmah Mansor cannot match or pegang lilin to Ziana vocal prowess la. Maybe should take singing lessons from ZianaNazri, in taking a swipe at Najib, said those who are prime minister must have high moral standards. "caught in the act of adultery" with Zaina Zain in Port Dickson, which is actually a smokescreen!! Najib had indeed been caught with that actress, but not in Port Dickson but in a hotel in Kuala Lumpur. Najib's special Branch officers had inserted the story of it being in Port Dickson in order to lay the ground for his alibi and it has now been conveniently covered up and the blame place on his underlings in the Army!!
Posted: 15 Apr 2011 04:08 AM PDT
Why is no one investigating Najib and Rosmah?
Why did two unknown commandos with absolutely no motive get charged and convicted? Can someone answer these questions?
This is the best piece I've read on the Mongolian model fiasco so far.
Raja Petra Kamarudin's interview by TV3 last night is undoubtedly a piece of political propaganda aimed at cleansing Prime Minister Najib Razak's taint with the Altantuya murder case ahead of the Sarawak elections two days from now.
Raja Petra's interview was centered on an affidavit he signed on June 18, 2008, in which he claimed he was reliably told by his informant that Najib's wife Rosmah Mansor was at the scene of the crime to witness the blasting of Altantuya Shariibuu's body. But Raja Petra now claims that he no longer believes what he believed then.
Let us be very clear on this issue at the very outset. The veracity or otherwise of that affidavit as well as whatever belief or disbelief Raja Petra may have over the Altantuya case does not add to or subtract one bit from the dark clouds that persist in hanging over Najib with regard to this murder case.
Failure of institutions
Such negative perceptions of Najib do not arise from so-and-so says this or that. Rather, they have accumulated over Najib's own failure to conduct himself appropriately as well as the effort by our law-enforcing institutions to keep Najib out of bounds from due legal process. The overtly protective shield provided Najib is to the point of dereliction of duty and borders on criminal collusion.
It is these flagrant institutional failures as well Najib's own clumsily evasive conduct that has deepened public suspicion. These instances are too many to enumerate, but we will mention a few to refresh public memory.
Starting with the police, there is no reason whatsoever why the police should have left Najib and his aide-de-camp Musa Safri out of its loop of investigation, when all the three accused were closely linked to the prime minister.
Police failure was even more glaring when it failed to act on all three of private investigator P. Balasubramaniam's affidavits and video interview by three senior lawyers.
The information provided by Bala in these documents not only incriminated Najib (in first affidavit) but also accused Rosmah and Najib's brother Nazim of forcing Bala and his family to flee the country with bribes and threats (recorded in video interview and submitted via the third affidavit). The third affidavit was in reply to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission's (MACC) written questions, and submitted in July 2010. There has been no response from MACC, despite written reminders by Bala's lawyer.
What possible reason is there for the police and MACC to remain silent over these serious accusations, backed by details, against the Prime Minister and his family? If Najib and family are innocent, wouldn't these law enforcing bodies have sprung to action in the first instance to clear the PM and family of such a horrible stigma?
The scenario in the court is even more bizarre. Revealing and critical evidence exposed in court was quickly smothered, instead of being pursued in the cause of truth and justice. The extraordinary part is that the attempt to bury these new evidences was not engendered by one or two parties but by all the three parties acting in concert - prosecutor, defence and judge.
One piece of evidence is the missing immigration record of Altantuya, and its erasure which hints at providing a lead to some high-powered involvement in the case. The other piece of evidence is an alleged photograph of Najib, Altantuya and the third accused having a meal in a restaurant, which if tendered, would have nailed Najib who repeatedly swore that he had never known nor met Altantuya.
This grotesque phenomenon of confluence of interest of all the judicial players in not pursuing the evidence can have only one explanation - Najib must be kept out of this case.
That justice might not have been fully served through the sentencing of the first two accused to death should be obvious, when the court never bothered to probe into the motive of executing the girl - and in such cruel fashion. It is not difficult to fathom why motive of murder was never mentioned in court. The simple answer is: there is none.
The two convicted killers, who were bodyguards to Najib, and trained to execute orders rigidly without question, had no motive on their own to kill someone they had never met. And since the third accused, who was accused of instigating the killing, was set free due to lack of evidence, then the remaining question must be: Who ordered the killing? Is it conceivable that the bodyguards had killed without order and without motive? Isn't it logical to deduce that the mastermind and real culprit may still be lurching somewhere beyond the realm of the court?
It is clear that major questions and swirling doubts over the handling of the case are still unresolved. Until these are satisfactorily answered through a just court and an honourable police force, which can only be brought into existence through a complete change of political leadership, it is naïve to hope for the return of justice to the Altantuya family and the nation.
And until such time, Premier Najib Razak cannot expect to be free from the haunt of Altantuya's murder.
Posted: 15 Apr 2011 04:04 AM PDT
No...this is NOT an Omega. This is Tag Heuer Carrera Automatic...
Tag watches are world famous, worn and endorsed by celebs, sportsmen and politicians.
Whereas Omega was only made famous by Mr Sleuth James Bond 007. Omega was the official timepiece for Mr Bond, as much the Aston Martin was his ride in the pre-Millennium Bond movies but the honour is now with BMW.
Jaguar was the official ride for British sleuth Simon Templar's tv series while Volvo S40 was the sleuth's ride in The Saint, the movie. The was no official timepiece.
Recently Omega was suddenly a well-known brand so much so a longhouse chieftain (tuai) in Sarawak had asked a certain politician of a his watch reported missing (or was it stolen?) from a certain hotel room. That means the tuai was a well-informed person, especially on the brand.
In fact the whole country is overwhelmed by this Omega brand, i.e. a certain specially-designed model said to be a gift from a certain Arab kingdom.
The problem with the politician was that he is an Omega, not a Tag Heuer.
For guys (yours truly included) with Tag, we are just like the brand, "Tag Heuer: Don't Crack Under Preassure"...
|You are subscribed to email updates from ☪ Journal Sociopolitical Blogs |
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.
|Email delivery powered by Google|
|Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610|