Thursday, June 3, 2010

Siapa di sebalik kemelut Istana Mahkota Kelantan...

Siapa di sebalik kemelut Istana Mahkota Kelantan...


Siapa di sebalik kemelut Istana Mahkota Kelantan...

Posted: 03 Jun 2010 02:45 PM PDT

NO FAMILY FEUD! In fact, the Kelantan royal family remains intact. Yes, there are minor problems which they can solve among themselves. And they DONT need outside interference. Misinterpretation brought about by certain quarters serving and used to serve the Istana Mahkota in Kubang Kerian has led to public perception that the family is breaking up.

I dont want to write about the domestic issues but rather concentrate on the cahood formed by various people - some of whom are well-known figures - to run down His Majesty Sultan Ismail Petra ibni Almarhum Sultan Yahya Petra and his government. To be precise, to tear them apart.

Most importantly, I have evidence on papers and CD, one of which was sent to Home Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Tun Hussein for preview and investigation. However, no action has been taken. I personally believe our Prime Minister Datuk Seri Mohd Najib Tun Razak, too has seen the CD.

As I want the Malays, especially in Kelantan to read and understand it, I will continue in Bahasa Malaysia.

Saya bukan rakyat Kelantan. Negeri saya, Melaka sudah kehilangan raja berdaulatnya ratusan tahun dahulu. Sebagai rakyat Malaysia yang mendokong kepentingan institusi beraja, saya rasa terpanggil untuk mencari dan mengesan punca masalah yang menyebabkan nama baik sebuah istana berdaulat sedikit tercemar dengan pelbagai khabar angin, fitnah dan tanggapan umum yang berbeza-beza. Semuanya tercetus sejak Sultan Kelantan gering tahun lalu.

Dalam Bahagian I ini, saya tidak ingin menulis panjang lebar tetapi cukuplah sekadar mengutarakan dahulu tajuk utamanya di sini iaitu tuduhan terhadap Raja Perempuan Kelantan, layanan buruk yang diberikan kepada Sultan, 'penculikan' dan gempur ala-Mafia polis terhadap Sultan dan rawatan untuk pesakit otak yang diberikan kepada baginda di Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (HUSM).

Saya tidak bercadang mensabitkan sesiapa tetapi berharap agar kisah berikutnya nanti mampu memberi gambaran sebenar mengenai apa sebenarnya yang menyelubungi penghuni Istana Mahkota. Raja Perempuan, Tengku Anis ada menghuraikan beberapa hal penting di dalam suratkhabar tabloid terbaru di pasaran seluruh negara, Transisi. Edisi sulungnya mula dijual hari ini.

Saya akan menulis mengenainya setiap dua hari sekali sehingga mencakupi semua perkara yang perlu dimaklumkan kepada orang ramai, khasnya rakyat Kelantan agar mereka memahami kedudukan sebenarnya, tanpa prejudis.

Saya juga tidak berniat memburukkan sesiapa sama ada mereka yang ada di dalam atau di luar Istana. Matlamat utama pembongkaran ini ialah menyedarkan mereka yang terbabit agar tidak sekali-kali menggunakan hubungan baik dengan Istana untuk kepentingan peribadi.


Bangsa Melayu Dimalukan Sewaktu Kongress PKR

Posted: 03 Jun 2010 12:11 PM PDT

Saya sempat bercakap dengan kawan saya yang menghadiri Kongress PKR di Kota BAru minggu lepas. Antara komen awal beliau adalah perwakilan-perwakilan yang bercakap pasal jawatan dan marah pada Tan Sri Khalid sebab tak beri jawatan adalah rata-rata berbangsa Melayu.

Beliau hairan kerana perwakilan-perwakilan yang berbangsa India, Cina, Iban, Dayak tak sebut sikit pun pasal jawatan. Malahan perwakilan orang Asli dari Pahang tu bercakap lebih berfakta dan berdaya maju berbanding dengan perwakilan-perwakilan bangsa Melayu.

Rata-rata yang menaikkan isu Tan Sri Khalid tak beri jawatan, tak beri projek, tak beri itu, tak beri ini adalah mereka yang berbangsa Melayu. Saya tersentak dan pada masa itu saya merasa amat malu kerana saya pun bangsa Melayu keturunan Minang.

Nasib baiklah ada perwakilan Terengganu yang telah bercakap dengan cukup baik dan memberi peringatan yang cukup membina. Seperti yang dilaporkan oleh Poji Topeng Perak:

Lain-lain Perwakilan terutama dari Terengganu sangat-sangat membina bagi aku, dalam korang-korang dok membantai Tan Sri Khalid pasal tak bagi jawatan dan tak reject orang-orang bukan Pro Pakatan Rakyat di Selangor, Perwakilan dari terengganu tampil mengingatkan para pemerhati supaya renung balik apa yang berlaku di Terengganu akibat dari tindakan Kerajaan PAS Terengganu dulu.

Apa yang PAS Terengganu lakukan dulu masa dapat ambik alih Terengganu, sama macam apa yang kebanyakan perwakilan minta Tan Sri Khalid buat. reject yang bukan Pro Pakatan Rakyat dalam Kerajaan Negeri Selangor, serah semua Jawatan-Jawatan penting pada ahli parti dan bla bla bla...

Diakhirnya apa yang berlaku di Terengganu.. ? 4 Negeri yang kita tak sangka boleh menang akhirnya menang dengan bergaya sementara Terengganu menaggung malu akibat perbuatan bodoh.

Di saat akhir pemerintahan PAS Terengganu, bukan sahaja orang bukan PAS yang dipancung, orang PAS yang bukan orang Terengganu pun dipancung sama.

Kawan saya yang pernah menjadi exco Pemuda Selangor turut menjadi mangsa apabila Pusat Pemulihan Akhlak yang beliau tubuhkan dan berjaya. Beliau dipecat kerana mahu digantikan oleh seorang Ustaz yang baru balik Azhar tapi dari PAS Terengganu.

Sedangkan kawan saya ni bangsa Jawa dan tidak berasal dari Terengganu. Tak sampai sebulan selepas beliau dipecat tanpa apa-apa alasan, Terengganu jatuh semula ke UMNO.

Di Selangor pun, konspirasi untuk menjatuhkan MB Selangor sebelum ini dipacu oleh orang-orang PAS di mana SU Politik PResiden sendiri terlibat. Takkan kita dah lupa?

Saya cukup malu dengan perangai orang Melayu. Baik dalam PAS mahupun dalam PKR, sama sahaja. Ramai yang gila jawatan. Ramai yang gila pangkat walaupun tak sedar diri tu tak layak. Tapi nak jugak pegang jawatan.

Itulah sebabnya PAS telah kalah dua kali di Terengganu. Kita tengok dalam PAS, apabila mereka lihat di Terengganu mereka dah takda harapan memerintah, mereka terus kacau PAS di Pusat. Semua nak digantikan dengan orang Terengganu sehingga PAS Pusat lebih nampak macam PAS Terengganu. Yang penting jawatan. Kerja tak penting.

Sekarang barulah kita paham kenapa orang Melayu ni lemah dan tak mampu bersaing. Semuanya nak pangkat tanpa mengira kelayakan.

Pada mereka yang kemaruk nak pangkat ni, saya cadangkan supaya ambil satu jam dalam bilik yang sunyi dan tulis kesemua kebolehan saudara satu demi satu (orang putih panggil tulis "resume"). Lepas tu baca balik dan buat keputusan. Layak atau tidak kamu memegang jawatan?

TAN SRI KHALID DIKRITIK HEBAT SEBAB…..

Tan Sri Khalid teruk kena tegur sewaktu Konvensyen PKR baru-baru ini.
Saya merujuk kepada tulisan Reformis Nora sendiri berkenaan Tan Sri Khalid tahun lepas:

Bagi Nora....kalau Khalid bersalah sungguhpun isu itu kecil sahaja maka dia sepatutnya di hukum tetapi yang merisaukan Nora adalah ini adalah hasil dari kerja orang yang mahu loncatan politik – mahu tempat dan kuasa.

Sungguhpun tindakan untuk menghapuskan rasuah tetapi menurut empunya cerita orang ini merasuah juga untuk menjatuhkan Khalid. Nazri dari GERAK dan Khir Toyo jadi alat saja untuk agenda peribadi orang ini – kata pemberi maklumat pada Nora. Waduh....PKR...PKR......siapa yang menjadi dalang dalam isu ini .....mungkin Nora dan pemberi maklumat sahaja yang tahu...mungkin juga ramai yang tahu ...tetapi klu nya mudah – ada pertubuhan gerakan reformis yang mahu ditaja untuk membuat kerja-kerja politik sebegini dan kemudian akan diberi projek – jadi orang ini bukan orang kecil juga dalam PKR...wa duh....

Tak heranlah. Ramai yang kemaruk nak jawatan, nak duit, nak pangkat lepas tu buat konspirasi nak jatuhkan Tan Sri Khalid. Bukan sebab Tan Sri jahat, tapi sebab Tan Sri nak ubah perangai orang Melayu di Selangor ni.

Tulang Besi


there is evidence of penetration even without clinical injuries found on the complainant,” Mohd Razali said.

Posted: 03 Jun 2010 11:56 AM PDT

Anwar, the 62-year-old PKR de facto leader, is charged with sodomising Saiful at Unit 11-5-1 of the Desa Damansara Condominium in Jalan Setiakasih, Bukit Damansara here between 3.01pm and 4.30pm on June 26, 2008.

The former deputy prime minister has denied the charge, describing it as "evil, frivolous lies by those in power"

Of all the persons in Malaysia, why should Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan tsee NAJIB, GHANI PATAIL, rodone and ezam, who see Anwar as their deadliest enemy, a day or two prior to lodging the police report ? After all, under normal circumstances, an allegation of such nature is not that important to warrant their attention.

Conspirators can try to fabricate imaginary events and cover up the truth with lies and deceit but the truth will eventually come out like water dribbling out of a leaky container. Small details which do not fit get in the way like jagged edges which rip the story apart. Lies may need more lies to cover up the holes that appear under examination but more lies may punch more holes in the framework until the whole thing collapses and the deception is exposed.

In Saiful's allegation of sodomy against Anwar Ibrahim, so many contradictions and gaping holes have appeared in his story that it has all but fallen apart. No reasonable person will believe that the alleged act actually happened in the face of such contradictions and illogical explanations bordering on the bizarre and the ludicrous.

A contradictory charge

In the first place the charge itself is a serious contradiction to the star witness's public insistence that he was sodomized against his will.

So why was Anwar charged for consensual sodomy under Section 377B when it should have been Section 377C for non-consensual sodomy? This is not a matter of the Attorney-General's prerogative to prefer a charge which carries a lighter sentence as claimed by the prosecution. Whether there was consent or not changes the whole nature of the act and the thrust of the prosecution. In 377C the prosecution must prove force was used, in 377B it need not. In forced sodomy the prosecution has a co-operative witness to testify against the accused, in consensual sodomy it must find other ways. In real life one does not the luxury of a co-operative witness AND not having to prove force which is clearly a distortion of the truth and prejudicial to the defense.

Naturally the prosecution would rather not take up the daunting task of proving how a frail 62 year old man with a bad back can forcibly sodomize a lad bigger and stronger than him. But now we have a case in which the charge does not tally with what the accuser claimed happened. In any healthy judiciary the case would be thrown out of court based on this crucial contradiction but we do not have a healthy judiciary.

If indeed the act was consensual why mobilize the whole apparatus of state to investigate and prosecute Anwar with countless manhours and millions spent when the act was allegedly between two consenting adults? Why such ferocious effort when has the government shown no interest in prosecuting anybody else for consensual sodomy despite a thriving gay community?

Saiful's contradictory behaviour

Saiful claimed to have been sodomized a total of eight times against his will over a period of months so why didn't he report to the police the first time it happened? We know that he is not gay as he has a fiancé and being sodomized must be downright humiliating and disgusting so it is incredulous to think that he did nothing but tolerated the act.

Bearing in mind that Anwar is physically no match for him and as an opposition leader has no power to put him in any fear, Saiful's claim of being sodomized multiple times is a serious contradiction to his public stance that the act was non-consensual.

After the last alleged incident in the condominium, Saiful waited for two days before making a police report. He went to work as usual the next day and in the evening attended a function in Anwar's house where he served drinks to the guests. The next day he sent a cheerful quit e-mail to Anwar. By no stretch of the imagination is this the behaviour of a person who has been forcibly sodomized against his will.

Saiful's public insistence of non-consensual sodomy goes beyond the material contradiction in the charge preferred against Anwar. He had sworn this on the Koran in a mosque during the Permatang Pauh by-election campaign under the glare of the press and TV cameras and allowed BN to make political capital of this against Anwar. If we believe his claim in court that he had no political motive we have to admit that he must be the most publicity hungry rape victim in the world bar none, male or female.

Although Saiful's response to the supposedly non-consensual acts is bewildering and abnormal, details of the persons he met prior to making his police report would blow any doubts of a political conspiracy away.

Saiful's meetings

Saiful has admitted in court that he met Najib Razak who was the deputy prime minister at that time two days before the last alleged act to discuss his problem. For an ordinary citizen to be able to gain access to the second most powerful person in the country is highly suspicious but what he told the court of the DPM's response is even more unbelievable. According to Saiful, Najib said his problem with Anwar is a personal matter and he could not do anything.

We are asked to believe that Najib passed over the opportunity to capture and destroy his greatest political nemesis over a criminal act. Bearing in mind that Section 13 of the Criminal Procedure Code states that it is an offence for anyone to withhold information and not to make a police report if they know a crime has been committed this would mean that Najib knowingly abetted a crime.

Saiful also admitted that he met a high ranking police officer, SAC Rodwan in the Concord Hotel Shah Alam a day before the last alleged sodomy act. Prior to this he had talked to Rodwan on the phone at least 8 times. Rodwan is well known for his dubious role in spiking a mattress with Anwar's blood sample in sodomy I. Furthermore, Saiful has also talked to the IGP Musa Hassan at least once over the phone.

Why would a meeting with a police officer ostensibly to discuss his sodomy problem be held in a hotel room if not to keep it secret? Why the need for such secrecy if not to discuss something shifty? Why did the police fail to set a trap for Anwar to catch him red handed and with video recordings "Chua Soi Lek style" if indeed the sodomy claims were true? The reason why such a trap was never set up was because no sodomy ever took place.

Saiful also said that he met Ezam, political turncoat who betrayed Anwar's trust and Mumtaz, an aide of Rosmah Mansor, Najib's wife and both of them advised him against lodging a police report. We don't know which is more incredulous – that he shared his humiliating problem with people whom he has no close personal relationship with or that they advised him not to make a police report.

Saiful's court testimony

Saiful testified in court that he was propositioned indecently by Anwar in a condominium in Kuala Lumpur and he was shocked, horrified and disgusted by Anwar's direct advance.

Let us pause a minute here. This is a man who claimed to have been sodomized no less than seven (7) times before all over Asia so why the shock, horror and disgust? The details do not match the alleged circumstances.

Even more telling is his description of what happened later. After his supposedly "shock, horror and disgust," he took a shower, emerged with a towel and lay down on the bed after which Anwar pulled the curtains, switched off the lights and the alleged non-consensual act took place. Surely this is stretching the definition of non-consensual too far?

Saiful also claimed that he did not wash his anus and did not pass motion for 2 days to preserve the evidence. If he had wanted to nail Anwar why didn't he go immediately to the police instead of engaging in such heroics for 2 days before making a report?

Saiful's claim that Anwar was his idol is contrary to his college mates who said he was known to be very pro-BN and anti-Anwar. In an interview which was recorded on video, one college mate said that when he heard that Saiful has taken a job in Anwar's office he assumed that Saiful's intention was to do something bad to Anwar.

Prosecution or Persecution?

In sexual offences of this nature the primary fact to be established first is medical evidence of penetration. No prosecutors in any healthy, functioning democracy will bring such a case to court without supportive medical evidence.

Here we have this dubious case rammed to trial despite two independent medical reports certifying that there was no evidence of penetration which shows clearly that this is no ordinary case of a victim seeking justice.

The prosecution has also fought tooth and nail to transfer this case from the Sessions Court to the High Court despite the lower court being qualified to hear the case. If they have any real evidence they could have convicted Anwar in any court instead of behaving as if their whole case depends on who hears it.

Why did the prosecution refuse to give the witness list, witness statements and details of any evidence beneficial to the defense as required under the Criminal Procedure Code, even fighting all the way to the Federal Court? This appears to be a trial by ambush with the flexibility to change the details as required to suit the ongoing trial.

The only physical evidence possessed by the prosecutors appears to be Anwar's DNA sample allegedly extracted from Saiful's rectum. As doctors have found no evidence of penetration how can this be possible?

Let us reflect a moment on this. Without penetration there can be no incriminating DNA extracted from Saiful's rectum. So either two independent medical reports were false or the so-called evidence was cooked. The first medical report was done by a highly experienced expatriate Burmese doctor who examined Saiful without knowing beforehand the political circumstances of the case. The second medical report was prepared by three specialists at a government hospital (HKL) who confirmed the first doctor's finding.

Meanwhile the investigation and prosecution is under the control of a government known to be authoritarian and economical with the truth with an arrogant attitude of might makes right. Malaysians will remember the shameful spectacle of sodomy I and the conviction of Anwar in 1998 by a kangaroo court. Many of the actors in sodomy I such as Gani Patail (chief public prosecutor in sodomy I, now Attorney-General), Musa Hassan (chief of police investigation team and mattress carrier in sodomy I, now IGP) and SAC Rodwan (DNA evidence fabricator in sodomy I, now highest ranking police officer in Melaka) are also playing starring roles in sodomy II.

Against this background the reader should decide who is more trustworthy – the four doctors or the prosecutors?

Lies and liars

All that has transpired so far points to a sordid political conspiracy to put the opposition leader behind bars and destroy his political career at a point when the political hegemony of the ruling regime has been threatened like never before.

Saiful has come off as a simpleton liar who fails to make his lies logical, believable and consistent. His tale is full of contradictions and his behaviour does not match the circumstances which he paints to the world. Although we should not expect too much of a college dropout he appears to have been badly coached.

The prosecution has given the unmistakable impression of a crude political persecution rather than seeking justice in good faith. The court processes fall far short of international standards for a fair trial.

On the sidelines Malaysians and the international community are left bewildered at the arrogant recklessness of the ruling party to try to pull off such a transparent stunt under the watchful eyes of the international press in the era of rapid information dissemination via the Internet.

The BN government is either dense enough to believe that they can pull off a brilliant conspiracy to convince the world of Anwar's guilt or are contend to join the ranks of international pariahs like Zimbabwe, Myanmar and North Korea.

At this point the conspiracy has all but broken apart. Any sensible regime with any sense of survival would abandon this vile conspiracy but the BN regimes seem hell bent on executing its own destruction.

What else can it be other than a clear cut CONSPIRAY. Everybody knows that except the judge hearing the case. Had the judge been clean and God fearing, he would have thrown the case out long ago. thus saving the taxpayers money

Subpoena all those bastards and grill them .Expose to the whole world of their rottenness.

The sodomy trial of Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim took a graphic turn today when a government doctor testified that evidence of semen in the complainant's anal region was sufficient to indicate penetration.

Dr Mohd Razali Ibrahim, one of the three doctors who had examined Anwar's accuser, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan, on June 28, 2008, said the swab samples taken from Saiful's anus showed signs of semen, but that there was no tear or injury to the anus. The examination was done two days after the alleged sodomy.

"With all the reports before me now, I would say that there is evidence of penetration even without clinical injuries.

"With presence of semen, there is evidence of anal penetration," said Dr Razali in response to the prosecution's questions in court today.

Solicitor-General II Datuk Yusof Zainal Abiden had earlier asked Dr Razali about his own report dated June 28, which stated that there were "no injuries, no tear… no conclusive findings of penetration to the rectum."

The doctor explained that, at the time, he had no knowledge of the location of swab samples which were taken from Saiful.

"I checked and found around anal anatomy appears to be moist, but I can't find evidence of injury or trauma."

"I only found small haemorrhoids, which is not significant in this case," he said.

The swab samples, according to another report, had evidence of semen.

The report was only made known to Dr Razali (right) today by the prosecution during questioning.

This led Dr Razali to change his conclusion based on the new report, which shed light on the areas from which the swab samples had been taken.

He read out the report which stated swab samples B5, B7, B8, and B9 as containing semen.

It is understood that swabs B5, B7, B8, and B9 were taken respectively from the perianal region, high rectal swab, and low rectal swab.

"I would conclude (now) there is evidence of penetration," said Razali.

Razali told the court that he was the surgeon on-call on June 28, 2008, from 8am-8am (June 29) and had examined Saiful at an emergency room of Hospital Kuala Lumpur at 9pm that night.

"On 7pm, I was called… informed that there was a sodomy case. I went to emergency unit at 9pm," he said.

Razali said once there, he met a few people — two specialists as well as several police officers.

The two specialists, Dr Khairul Nizam Hassan and Dr Siew Sheue Seng, were then brought in to be identified in court.

Razali claimed he only saw Saiful in the emergency room after a briefing with police and medical officers who informed him of the case.

"I examined the bottom part of victim, anal and rectal. Upon Saiful's permission, I examined the internal part of anus using special tools," said Dr Razali.

A protoscope (a tool used for rectal examinations) was then produced in court.

Judge Datuk Mohamed Zabidin Mohd Diah fixed tomorrow morning for Anwar's team to cross-examine the doctor, after objections from Karpal.

What penetration? Let's get the facts right, says Sivarasa

In the run-up to Anwar Ibrahim's sodomy trial, his lawyers including senior counsel Sivarasa Rasiah had warned that in the end the government would try to nail the Opposition Leader based on fabricated DNA evidence.

And it looks like they may have guessed correctly.

On Thursday, lead prosecutor Mohd Yusof Zainal Abidin managed to get Dr Mohd Razali Ibrahim, one of three HKL doctors who examined complainant Saiful Bukhari Azlan, to stun the Court by agreeing that there was anal penetration.

"With all these reports I have now, there is evidence of penetration even without clinical injuries found on the complainant," Mohd Razali said.

No, he did not reverse or overturn his own HKL medical report, which in fact, he stood by. Corroborated by two colleagues, the report had stated there were no conclusive clinical findings suggesting there was penetration of the anus nor were there any significant defensive wound on the complainant's body.

A second medical report from Hospital Pusrawi also came to the same conclusion. Why then did Dr Mohd Razali, who has handled more than 100 cases involving the anal area, tell the Court that he "would say there was penile penetration"?

Malaysia Chronicle spoke to Sivarasa who explained that it was because Mohd Razali was making an inference based on the Chemistry Department's report and not from his own direct evidence, which is the HKL medical report.

"Mohd Razali has no right to make such an inference as it is outside his scope. He is responsible only for his own medical examination and report, which he has confirmed. He stands by the HKL report which states very clearly there were no signs of penetration," Sivarasa said.

"But based on the Chemistry Department's report of having found semen on the swabs, Dr Mohd Razali put two and two together and now he claims there was penetration. Obviously, we will ask the Court to reject this inference and focus on the doctor's direct evidence, which I repeat is the HKL medical report.

"The chemistry report is none of his business. It is the Chemistry Department which is responsible for the identification of the semen and DNA samples and not the Dr Mohd Razali. Any inference on this aspect should come from the Chemistry Department as it is their direct evidence, not Razali's."

During Anwar's first sodomy trial in 1998, the Chemistry Department found semen on a mattress but the findings were so weak that during cross-examination, its testimony was discredited and had to be rejected by the Court.

Dr Mohd Razali will be cross-examined by the defense soon, while the Chemistry Department has yet to testify.

Nevertheless, the doctor's sensational testimony has stirred up a media storm with the mainstream media quick to insinuate that the medical evidence did indeed show penetration.

"Not true at all. As I said, Razali actually confirmed the HKL medical report that there was no evidence of penetration. He only deduced there was penetration when he was asked by the prosecutor to take into account the Chemistry Department's report and he should not do that," Sivarasa said.

Karpal had wanted more time for preparation in light of Dr Razali's testimony today.

Another lawyer, Sankara Nair, agreed with this.

"This is an ambush, unprofessional prosecution. I want time. What the doctor has said just now is merely an assumption during examination-in-chief.

"He is just a general surgeon. He says he's seen many [posteriors], [it] doesn't make him an expert. We will ask him why he didn't know (about the swab samples)," said Sankara.

Anwar claimed "two or three semen samples" were found on Saiful.But Anwar said he was not surprised by the doctor's testimony.

The Pakatan Rakyat de facto leader claimed that there were "two or three semen samples" found on Saiful, but did not elaborate any further.

"The question is, whose semen is this? You'd be surprised to know whose semen is it from," said Anwar.

Earlier on in court, Karpal claimed that Anwar was in unit 11-5-2 of the Desa Damansara Condominium during the time of the alleged sodomy, not in 11-5-1 as Saiful had claimed.

This did not sit well with Saiful, who insisted that Anwar was with him in unit 11-5-1 at the time.

"No, your honour, it's not true," said Saiful.

Karpal also stressed that this would be the defence team's strategy.

"Our defence is alibi," said Karpal.

Anwar, the 62-year-old PKR de facto leader, is charged with sodomising Saiful at Unit 11-5-1 of the Desa Damansara Condominium in Jalan Setiakasih, Bukit Damansara here between 3.01pm and 4.30pm on June 26, 2008.

The former deputy prime minister has denied the charge, describing it as "evil, frivolous lies by those in power"

Posted by the taxidriver786



Kenyataan Media: Kematian Norhashimah Timbulkan Banyak Persoalan

Posted: 03 Jun 2010 09:16 AM PDT

03 Jun 2010 |

Kematian Allahyarham Norhashimah Wahid, Pegawai Tadbir dan Diplomatik (PTD) di Kementerian Kewangan berikutan menjalani latihan ala-komando Isnin lepas jelas merupakan satu insiden yang begitu mendukacitakan.

Tiap doa, ingatan dan setulus takziah kami senantiasa bersama-sama keluarga Allahyarham yang kini berada dalam keadaan yang sukar, khususnya suami Allahyarham, Ahmad Zuhairi Zainal Abidin dan anak mereka, Nor Hylda Dania.

Kami berkesempatan meziarahi keluarga Allahyarham bersama-sama YB Azmin Ali pada 1 Jun lepas.

Dalam masa yang sama, kami menggesa Kerajaan Persekutuan khususnya Jabatan Perkhidmatan Awam untk menjalankan siasatan yang terbuka dan telus ke atas isu ini, apakah berlaku kecuaian di kalangan pelatih.

Tidak boleh tidak, persoalan akan terus timbul mengenai keperluan wujudnya latihan ketenteraan yang mencabar fizikal bagi para penjawat awam negara.

Umum bersetuju bahawa wujud keperluan penjawat awam khususnya pegawai PTD untuk cergas mental dan fizikal, tetapi dalam masa yang sama masih banyak saluran yang boleh dibentuk yang lebih rasional untuk membentuk semangat kekitaan di kalangan mereka.

Insiden ini, seperti mana insiden-insiden malang yang berlaku di dalam Program Latihan Khidmat Negara (PLKN) menimbulkan beberapa persoalan serius ke atas komitmen Kerajaan ke atas kebajikan peserta di bawah seliaan mereka.

Kami ingin membangkitkan beberapa persoalan :

a) Siapakah yang mengendalikan Modul Bina Semangat berkenaan? Kami dimaklumkan bahawa modul terdahulu dikendalikan oleh Outward Bound School (OBS) tetapi dikendalikan oleh konsultan di tapak PULAPES. Sekiranya benar ia dikendalikan konsultan, apakah konsultan ini mempunyai latar belakang kejurulatihan profesional?

b) Apakah modul ini memenuhi mana-mana piawaian keselamatan dan mempunyai Prosedur Operasi Standard (SOP) yang jelas berhubung keselamatan peserta?

c) Mengapakah Allahyarham dipaksa meneruskan latihan fizikal tersebut sedangkan beliau sudahpun menunjukkan tanda-tanda sakit?

d) Apakah benar peserta terpaksa menggagahkan diri untuk meneruskan latihan tersebut kerana menerima ugutan bahawa mereka akan terpaksa mengulang semula keseluruhan latihan selama tujuh (7) bulan sekiranya mereka gagal menghabiskan latihan tersebut?

e) Mengapakah doktor yang merawat Allahyarham menyatakan bahawa Allahyarham lewat dihantar ke hospital untuk menerima rawatan?

f) Mengapakah suami Allahyarham hanya dimaklumkan oleh pihak hospital, bukan daripada pegawai yang menyelaras latihan berkenaan dan juga pegawai yang bertanggungjawab menghantar Allahyarham ke hospital?

Keluarga Allahyarham telah menafikan dakwaan oleh sesetengah pihak bahawa Allahyarham tidak sihat dan cergas. Beliau merupakan seorang penyelam bertauliah dan sangat menyukai aktiviti lasak. Sebarang keadaan yang mencurigakan dapat dikesan di dalam pemeriksaan kesihatan, dan dalam situasi ini,apakah peserta perlu melalui sebarang bentuk pemeriksaan kesihatan sebelum setiap modul dijalani sepenuhnya?

Hatta satu kehilangan nyawa seperti ini jelas merupakan satu kehilangan besar, dan sebarang kecuaian harus didedah dan dihukum.

Kenyataan yang dikeluarkan oleh JPA pada 1 Jun 2010 hanya menjelaskan pengisian kursus Diploma Pengurusan Awam secara umum tanpa mengulas secara spesifik apa yang dilalui oleh Allahyarham Norhashimah dan rakan-rakannya di dalam latihan ala-komando tersebut.

Malah kenyataan tersebut gagal menjawab penafian Tentera Udara Diraja Malaysia (TUDM) mengenai penglibatan mana-mana pegawai TUDM di dalam latihan tersebut.

Pihak berwajib tidak mempunyai pilihan melainkan mendasari isu ini dengan teliti dan memberi jaminan bahawa tidak ada mana-mana keluarga di Malaysia ini harus melalui pengalaman ngeri seumpama ini. Pihak berkenaan juga harus membekukan sebarang penglibatan peserta di dalam latihan seumpamanya sehinggalah tragedi ini disiasat sepenuhnya dengan telus dan terbuka.

Kami menerima banyak aduan dari PTD-PTD yang melalui modul yang sama. Sudah semestinya warganegara yang memilih untuk berkhidmat untuk negara berhak layanan yang lebih baik.

Sekali lagi, kami merakamkan rasa simpati dan sedih kami ke atas keluarga Allahyarham.

Nurul Izzah Anwar, Ahli Parlimen Lembah Pantai
Amiruddin Shari, Ahli Dewan Negeri Selangor Batu Caves
Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad, Ahli Dewan Negeri Selangor Seri Setia
Sim Tze Tzin, Ahli Dewan Negeri Pulau Pinang Pantai Jerejak


Ibu musykil, mahu kematian pelatih PTD disiasat telus

Posted: 03 Jun 2010 08:51 AM PDT

Malaysian Insider

Syed Muaz Syed Putra

June 03, 2010

KUALA LUMPUR, 3 Jun — Keluarga Allahyarham Norhashimah Wahid yang 'terkejut' dengan kematian pelatih Pegawai Tadbir dan Diplomatik itu Isnin lalu mahu kerajaan menjalankan siasatan terbuka ekoran timbulnya beberapa kemusykilan di sebalik tragedi ibu muda tersebut.

Norhashimah, 31, meninggal dunia ketika mengikuti latihan Modul Jati Diri di Jugra, Banting selama tujuh bulan sebelum disahkan dalam jawatan dan telah tiga bulan mengikuti latihan itu.

Ibunya, Norlia Hashim, 62, berkata, dia mahu kematian anaknya disiasat dengan telus kerana sehingga kini masih tidak tahu sebab Norhashimah boleh meninggal dalam "keadaan yang teruk sebegitu."

"Mungkin juga beliau ada dibuli kerana terdapat kesan luka dan lebam pada badannya," katanya.

Norlia juga mempersoalkan tindakan pegawai latihan Modul Jati Diri yang didakwa memaksa pelatih pegawai tadbir dan diplomatik itu meneruskan latihan walaupun mengetahui beliau menunjukkan tanda-tanda sakit.


"Saya nak tahu siapa pegawai yang memaksa Allahyarham untuk meneruskan latihan.

"Saya mendapat tahu ada pegawai yang bertindak menarik kain yang menyebulungi Allahyarham kerana tidak sihat dan memaksanya untuk terjun ke dalam lumpur sebelum melakukan aktiviti lain," katanya.

Norlia soal kenapa mesti memaksa Allahyarham sedangkan ketika itu dia sedang sakit.

"Adakah seorang peserta yang sakit juga akan dipaksa meneruskan latihan?" tanya beliau  kepada The Malaysian Insider ketika ditemui di rumahnya di Taman Keramat dekat sini.

"Saya mahu menemui pegawai tersebut untuk mengetahui mengapa dia bertindak sedemkian," tegas Norlia.

Norhashimah, 31, meninggal dunia Isnin lalu selepas menerima rawatan di Unit Rawatan Rapi, Hospital Tengku Ampuan Rahimah  setelah koma sejak Jumaat.

Dia dikatakan meninggal dunia kerana jangkitan paru-paru.

Allahyarham yang merupakan anak bongsu daripada empat beradik meninggalkan suami, Ahmad Zulkhairi Zainal Abidin, 31, dan seorang anak perempuan Nor Hylda Dania, dua tahun.

Sebelum kejadian, Norhashimah yang bertugas di Kementerian Kewangan di Putrajaya, mengadu tidak sihat, tetapi beliau terpaksa mengikuti latihan tersebut.

"Melalui kawan-kawan Allahyarham saya mengetahui bahawa dia ada memohon cuti kerana tidak sihat tetapi tidak dibenarkan.

"Sebaliknya Allahyarham diugut akan digagalkan sekiranya tidak menghabiskan latihan tersebut," kata Norlia lagi.

Norlia juga menafikan Norhashimah tidak sihat dan kurang cergas ketika mengikuti latihan tersebut.

"Sebelum Allahyarham mengikuti latihan tersebut beliau begitu sihat dan tidak ada langsung tanda-tanda tidak sihat.

"Lagipun beliau merupakan seorang penyelam bertauliah dan sangat menyukai aktiviti lasak, jadi saya hairan mengapa beliau boleh tidak sihat ketika berada dalam latihan tersebut.

"Selain itu, dia juga tidak mempunyai sebarang penyakit berbahaya termasuk asma," katanya.

Norliah juga kesal dengan tindakan pihak penyelaras latihan berkenaan yang merahsiakan keadaan anaknya itu.

"Saya memang amat kesal kerana pihak penyelaras latihan tidak memberitahu apa-apa langsung tentang keadaan anak saya.

"Saya tahu Allahyarham dimasukkan ke hospital apabila diberitahu oleh menantu, itu pun pihak hospital yang beritahu bukan pihak penyelaras program," katanya.

Pagi tadi, Ahli Parlimen Lembah Pantai Nurul Izzah Anwar dan beberapa pemimpin Angkatan Muda Keadilan mendesak diadakan siasatan terbuka.

"Saya juga mendapat maklumat bahawa mereka dilayan dengan begitu teruk sepanjang menyertai lathan tersebut.

"Saya akui semua orang mahukan yang terbaik untuk pegawai-pegawai tetapi mereka tidak perlu dilayan dengan teruk seperti minum air stokin dan mandi lumpur," katanya.

Beliau berkata kematian Allahyarham Norhashimah menimbulkan pelbagai soalan terutamanya dari segi pengendalian Modul Bina Semangat berkenaan.

Jabatan Perkhidmatan Awam sedang menjalankan siastan lanjut mengenai perkara itu.


Hijau Dari Zainal Abadin

Posted: 03 Jun 2010 08:11 AM PDT


This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

Where are we now? Bekuli ba Tanah Diri empu, baka ti di Ubah, Pantu

Posted: 03 Jun 2010 07:19 AM PDT

image001


Prosecutor has deceptively merely manufacturing evidences against Anwar

Posted: 03 Jun 2010 08:11 AM PDT

One day, a woman went to her doctor to discuss a 'problem' she was facing.

"My husband loves anal sex," she told the doctor.

"So?" the doctor asked.

"Well, is it safe?" asked the woman.

"Do you enjoy it?" asked the doctor.

With a blush on her face and not daring to look the doctor in the eye, she admitted that she does.

"Well, carry on then," the doctor replied, "as long as you also enjoy it."

Yes, God has sent us many signs. If not why would Augustine Paul expire at the same time as the sign above Umno's headquarters? Was not Augustine the main scumbag in the Anwar Ibrahim trial?

Fernando then took the court through the testimony of Raja Kamaruddin Raja Wahid, a.k.a Raja Komando, who had, in fine detail, revealed how the conspiracy against Anwar originally unfolded and the role he was given in this whole conspiracy.

"Ummi Hafilda is a prostitute," said Aziz Samsuddin Day three of Anwar Ibrahim's appeal hearing at the Kuala Lumpur Appeal Court hit a high note today when Christopher Fernando read out transcripts of the previous trial that quoted Aziz Samsuddin as saying Ummi Hafilda Ali is a prostitute.Fernando started by recapping yesterday's proceeding where he had told the court Ummi had been disowned by the father after she confessed to writing the letter to the Prime Minister, Dr Mahathir Mohamad, accusing Anwar of sodomising Azizan Abu Bakar, one-time driver of Anwar's wife, Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail.Ummi's father, a religious teacher, just before he died, wrote an open letter to the Harakah detailing the reasons he had disowned her and, in no uncertain terms, implicated her as the prime mover behind Azizan."Ummi's father died broken-hearted without ever forgiving his daughter for the role she played in framing Anwar of sodomy charges," related Fernando.

In the run-up to Anwar Ibrahim's sodomy trial, his lawyers including senior counsel Sivarasa Rasiah had warned that in the end the government would try to nail the Opposition Leader based on fabricated DNA evidence.

And it looks like they may have guessed correctly.

On Thursday, lead prosecutor Mohd Yusof Zainal Abidin managed to get Dr Mohd Razali Ibrahim, one of three HKL doctors who examined complainant Saiful Bukhari Azlan, to stun the Court by agreeing that there was anal penetration.

"With all these reports I have now, there is evidence of penetration even without clinical injuries found on the complainant," Mohd Razali said.

No, he did not reverse or overturn his own HKL medical report, which in fact, he stood by. This report, corroborated by his two colleagues, had stated there were no conclusive clinical findings suggesting there was penetration of the anus nor were there any significant defensive wound on the complainant's body.

A second medical report from Hospital Pusrawi also came to the same conclusion. Why then did Dr Mohd Razali, who has handled more than 100 cases involving the anal area, tell the Court that he "would say there was penile penetration"?

Malaysia Chronicle spoke to Sivarasa who explained that it was because Mohd Razali was making an inference based on the Chemistry Department's report and not from his own direct evidence, which is the HKL medical report.

"Mohd Razali has no right to make such an inference as it is outside his scope. He is responsible only for his own medical examination and report, which he has confirmed. He stands by the HKL report which states very clearly there were no signs of penetration," Sivarasa said.

"But based on the Chemistry Department's report of having found semen on the swabs, Dr Mohd Razali put two and two together and now he claims there was penetration. Obviously, we will ask the Court to reject this inference and focus on the doctor's direct evidence, which I repeat is the HKL medical report.

"The chemistry report is none of his business. It is the Chemistry Department which is responsible for the identification of the semen and DNA samples and not the Dr Mohd Razali. Any inference on this aspect should come from the Chemistry Department as it is their direct evidence, not Razali's."

related article The Watergate scandal was a political scandal in the United States in the 1970s vs the sodomy1&2 an UMNO political Conspiracy

"But can I become pregnant through anal sex?" asked the woman.

"Of course you can," the doctor replied. "Where do you think politicians come from?"

*************************************************

"And what is the purpose of the two stories above?" you might ask.

Well, considering that the world is crumbling around us — the Middle East is bringing the world to the brink of a Third World War with Israel's attack on the Peace Flotilla, three Israeli submarines are now in the Persian Gulf and are aiming its nuclear missiles on Iran, the three PIGs (Portugal, Italy and Greece) are going bankrupt and may drag the entire world including Malaysia down with it, and much, much more — yet the entire country is focused on just one issue, Saiful's arsehole. So, today, I thought I might as well jump onto the bandwagon and also talk about arseholes. After all, I don't want anyone to allege that Malaysia Today is not keeping up with the latest issue.

Dr Chua Soi Lek and woman getting ready for annal sex why was he not arrested for anal sex bloody barisan musa hassan

Solicitor-General II Mohamed Yusof Zainal Abidin, who led the prosecution team, replied that it was the discretion of the Attorney-General, as the prosecutor, to charge any person under any section.
black eye1
The scope of the Attorney-General's powers in Malaysia has long been a subject of debate and controversy. He is the chief legal adviser to the government and is responsible for advising ministers involved in legal proceedings in their official capacity related article why Gani Patail high ranking officier AG office was not CHARGE for not reporting the crime this is the blunt misuse of power by the B.N'S NAJIB'S SMS
. Fabrication is one of his specialities. Have you read the Unholy Trinity related article it's mindboggling!Public Prosecutor has deceptively merely manufacturing evidences against Anwar
Anwar Ibrahim's sodomy trial has been adjourned to tomorrow after the defence raised discrepancies over the charges framed and accuser Mohamad Saiful Bukhari Azlan's testimony yesterday Remember that infamous judge from Sodomy 1 ? The lawyers want the law to be applied in this trial? Don't the lawyers know what happen in sodomy 1 ? And what do you think will happen in sodomy 2 ? Correct Anwar will go to jail! All the lawyers can do is prolong the case.If that bugger Augustine Paul was still alive and the judge for the case, he would say it is irrelevant whether there is consent or not. In buggery , consent or not , it is still buggery the learned judge would declare. As long as Anwar does it , it does not matter who he sticks it to whether it is Saiful or Azizan. The time or the place is all irrelevant as far as the case of sodomy is concerned. Anwar did it before. Anwar did it again. Anwar will do it again, and again and again till he can't get it up. Then the saga ends. Stupid lawyers and judges are sodomising the courts of justice in this country.

[mob1900_sodomyII.jpg]
As a matter of national shame
As far as I know, the only sabotaging seems to be on the police side, who has until now steadfastly refused to reveal ongoing updates about their investigations, even though this case has so much public concern over it. Something to hide perhaps, or not sure of how to obtain more evidence slowing down the investigation?

Like fellow blogger Nat says, "Always targeting the messenger, always ignoring the message". That's a most apt description of our men in blue.

Here's what to look out for the next few days:

a) Calling the medical report to be authenticated. Most of the calls will be by UMNO members. Mohd Ezam has already started the ball rolling. In fact, some moron will most likely call for a Royal Commission of Inquiry to determine the authenticity of the medical report, just like the Lingam videos.

b) Police producing more evidence, for example, more sodomy victims. They were stupid enough to repeat the sodomy allegations, they will be stupid enough to use the same tactics. Those close to Anwar better be careful, or else you will end up coerced into a confession like Sukma Dermawan. Maybe they will get Mohd Ezam to be a volunteer.

c) Abdullah Ahmad Badawi and Najib Razak will maintain their roles of broken records by telling the citizens not to believe the lies in the blogs, and not to believe any rumours, and let the police do their job. I forgot Syed Hamid Albar. Yeah, him as well.

We'll see what happens la. Until later, enjoy Round 2 of the Anwar-Saiful sodomy saga.

Prosecution IS LICKING DRY ROSMA'S PUSSY it was the discretion of the Attorney-General, as the prosecutor, to charge any person under any section.

And below is a graphical presentation of what is the number one issue for Malaysia and which will decide the future of this country — whether Anwar had or had not penetrated Saiful's arsehole with his pecker.

relatedPART 1Disgusting opportunists as well as traitors Ezam & Anuar Shari conspired with Rosmah mansor NAJIB TUN Razak THE EPISODE SODOMY 11

Sad, very sad, when one arsehole decides the future of a country of 27 million people. I wonder, 100 years from now, when Malaysians look back on 2010, what the historians would be saying about this period of Malaysian history. India had its 'Black Hole of Calcutta' in June 1756 that changed the history of the Indian continent and planted the seed of the Indian nationalist movement. Are we going to see the 'Black Hole of Saiful' in June 2010 also change the course of Malaysian history?

Meanwhile, enjoy these reruns:

Nazri replied, Saiful is entitled to UMNO justice. HIS ASSHOLE IS TOO IMPORTANT , UMNO is getting desperate.

black eye1

Meanwhile, enjoy these reruns:

black eye1



Look on the bright side

Posted: 03 Jun 2010 07:34 AM PDT

Tomorrow is the start of the weekend. Yay!!! So, I thought in light of what's been happening recently in Bolehland that we could all do with some giggles and smiles. So here.........enjoys!


Niamah!!!


This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

BFM-ZUBEDY Unity Series ; - EMPATHY - By Dr Chandra - Must Listen

Posted: 03 Jun 2010 07:00 AM PDT

May 13th, 2010





For facebook readers, click here


Israel's Legal Right To Attack The Flotilla

Posted: 03 Jun 2010 06:12 AM PDT

The only thing I think Israel made a mistake in was in sending commandos on the boat. In my opinion they should have torpedoed the crap out of the ship.

Reuters: Q&A: Is Israel's naval blockade of Gaza legal?

(Reuters) - Israel has said it will continue a naval blockade of the Gaza Strip despite growing global pressure to lift the siege after a navy raid on a Turkish ferry carrying aid killed nine activists this week.

What is the legality of the blockade and did Israel's intervention breach international law? Below are some questions and answers on the issue:

CAN ISRAEL IMPOSE A NAVAL BLOCKADE ON GAZA?

Yes it can, according to the law of blockade which was derived from customary international law and codified in the 1909 Declaration of London. It was updated in 1994 in a legally recognized document called the "San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea."

Under some of the key rules, a blockade must be declared and notified to all belligerents and neutral states, access to neutral ports cannot be blocked, and an area can only be blockaded which is under enemy control.

"On the basis that Hamas is the ruling entity of Gaza and Israel is in the midst of an armed struggle against that ruling entity, the blockade is legal," said Philip Roche, partner in the shipping disputes and risk management team with law firm Norton Rose.

WHAT ARE INTERNATIONAL WATERS?

Under the U.N. Convention of the Law of the Sea a coastal state has a "territorial sea" of 12 nautical miles from the coast over which it is sovereign. Ships of other states are allowed "innocent passage" through such waters.

There is a further 12 nautical mile zone called the "contiguous zone" over which a state may take action to protect itself or its laws.

"However, strictly beyond the 12 nautical miles limit the seas are the "high seas" or international waters," Roche said.

The Israeli navy said on Monday the Gaza bound flotilla was intercepted 120 km (75 miles) west of Israel. The Turkish captain of one of the vessels told an Istanbul news conference after returning home from Israeli detention they were 68 miles outside Israeli territorial waters.

Under the law of a blockade, intercepting a vessel could apply globally so long as a ship is bound for a "belligerent" territory, legal experts say.

CAN ISRAEL USE FORCE WHEN INTERCEPTING SHIPS?

Under international law it can use force when boarding a ship.

"If force is disproportionate it would be a violation of the key tenets of the use of force," said Commander James Kraska, professor of international law at the U.S. Naval War College.

Israeli authorities said marines who boarded the Turkish vessel Mavi Marmara opened fire in self-defense after activists clubbed and stabbed them and snatched some of their weapons.

Legal experts say proportional force does not mean that guns cannot be used by forces when being attacked with knives.

"But there has got to be a relationship between the threat and response," Kraska said.

The use of force may also have other repercussions.

"While the full facts need to emerge from a credible and transparent investigation, from what is known now, it appears that Israel acted within its legal rights," said J. Peter Pham, a strategic adviser to U.S. and European governments.

"However, not every operation that the law permits is necessarily prudent from the strategic point of view."

OPPONENTS HAVE CALLED ISRAEL'S RAID "PIRACY." WAS IT?

No, as under international law it was considered a state action.

"Whether what Israel did is right or wrong, it is not an act of piracy. Piracy deals with private conduct particularly with a pecuniary or financial interest," Kraska said.

HAVE THERE BEEN ANY SHIPPING DISRUPTIONS AFTER THE RAID?

None so far but the International Chamber of Shipping (ICS), an association which represents 75 percent of the world's merchant fleet, has expressed "deep concern" over the boarding by Israeli forces, arguing that merchant ships have a right to safe passage and freedom of navigation in international waters.

"These fundamental principles of international law must always be upheld by all of the world's nations," the ICS said.


Here's the part of the San Remo document that gives Israel the legal right to attack the flotilla:

SECTION V : NEUTRAL MERCHANT VESSELS AND CIVIL AIRCRAFT

Neutral merchant vessels

67. Merchant vessels flying the flag of neutral States may not be attacked unless they:

(a) are believed on reasonable grounds to be carrying contraband or breaching a blockade, and after prior warning they intentionally and clearly refuse to stop, or intentionally and clearly resist visit, search or capture;
(b) engage in belligerent acts on behalf of the enemy;
(c) act as auxiliaries to the enemy s armed forces;
(d) are incorporated into or assist the enemy s intelligence system;


PRS/SPDP “MISUNDERSTOOD…James..??”

Posted: 03 Jun 2010 06:03 AM PDT

audie61was trying ot avoid the obvious. Lets all charge full steam ahead and go for the jugular. Many smses and calls the whole day were received as those outside Sarawak could not read the locally printed STAR and it was also not reported on the STAR online media portal. We were trying not to spoil the few days of merrymaking and welcoming the Gawai Festival but it was getting OVEN BAKED.

WHATS THE FUSS..? WHAT'S GOING

ON.?  

There were also a number of calls from other BN members who chided James for this latest outburst especially in the STAR. What is he thinking of and what is he up to seems to be the common question. We are unable to get hold of him as he is in Australia as what the papers says but we leave it to you to make up your own  judgement.

STAR HEADLINES:- MY AIM MISUNDERSTOOD

Masing: I was only thinking of what is best for SPDP

PRS President James Masing is disappointed that his efforts at ensuring that the SPDP will not suffer a split ahead of their proposed merger has been misunderstood.
Masing speaking to the STAR yesterday from Australia dismissed William Mawans claims that he was interfering in the party's affairs.He was also annoyed that Mawan has accused him of being " unprofessional."
If anything,I've been trying to keep their (SPDP) house in order.In fact Im helping Mawan out.When the SPDP five wanted to quit their party and wanted to be absorbed into PRS,I told them not to."he said
Mawan had told reporters on Tuesday that Masing should not interfere in his party's matters.
'I need to say this once and for all" A lot of things he (Masing) has said he shouldn't have.Thats not very professional.You manage your party and I manage mine,"said Mawan.
When asked about his working relationship with Mawan,Masing said he he had no problem with Mawan or other Dayak elected representatives in SPDP. however,he maintained that though he wanted the merger talks to be inclusive,it would be difficult to merge with SPDP if certain individuals were still in the party.
But if SPDP needs those personalities to be with them,thats their right.then the merger will take a backseat for a while,"Masing said
"I just don't want any more talks that could lead to a further split in the dayak community.The parties have been going back and forth about the merger since 2006 but little progress has been made.
A politcal watcher even said this to audie61," Why is James going 20 steps backwards and not 5 steps forward when the call for MULTI RACIAL PARTIES are the trend and not race based parties.
 Why dont he even invite the other party dayaks in PBB,SUPP and others to join him..? If he can do that then he can claim to be the No,1 DAYAK leader..?

BETTER STILL," THE 1Malaysia Dayak LEADER"



Akar Umbi Kecewa PM Ketepikan Pemuda UMNO

Posted: 03 Jun 2010 03:48 AM PDT

Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Razak di ingatkan supaya tidak sentiasa melupakan Ketua  Pemuda Umno Malaysia, Khairy Jamaluddin didalam barisan kabinetnya. Hal ini telah disuarakan oleh Ketua Pemuda Umno Selangor,  Suhaimi Mohd Ghazali dimana hasrat itu dipertimbangkan sewajarnya supaya Presiden UMNO itu dapat mengambil berat permintaan Pemuda kerana ianya pernah disuarakan sebelum ini.Namun jawapan yang diberikan hanya mahu menunjukkan kepada masyarakat bahawa kita (Pemuda Umno) sedia berkhidmat di dalam parti.

Bagaimanapun, akar umbi pergerakan itu tetap akur dengan keputusan rombakan terbaru yang dibuat kelmarin kerana akur segala apa-apa keputusan adalah di muktamad. Walaubagaimanapun, selepas rombakan terbaru kabinet  yang di umumkan itu menyaksikan Khairy sekali lagi tidak terpilih menganggotai jemaah menteri dan timbullah kini  suara-suara  bantahan beberapa pemimpin di dalam pergerakan itu.

Jika di imbas kembali, selepas mengambil-alih teraju kepimpinan negara daripada Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi,  nama Khairy tidak tersenarai dalam barisan anggota kabinet barunya dan dalam rombakan terbaru kelmarin, sekali lagi nama ketua Pemuda Umno itu yang juga ahli parlimen Rembau tidak tersenarai.

Dalam tradisi Umno, ketua Pemudanya sentiasa diberi jawatan dalam kabinet termasuklah Najib sendiri, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim dan Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein.Sementara itu, Naib Pemuda Umno Perak,  Ali Zainal Abidin pula berpendapat Khairy selaku Ketua Pemuda Umno, sepatutnya diberikan jawatan sekurang-kurang sebagai Timbalan Menteri.

Menurutnya, jika Khairy tidak memegang apa-apa jawatan dalam kabinet, secara tidak langsung semangat anggota pergerakan itu akan menjadi lemah, sekaligus menjejaskan gerak kerja BN untuk pilihan raya umum akan datang.Akibatnya nanti, susah hendak menarik orang muda untuk menyokong BN disebabkan ketua sendiri pun tidak ada jawatan..

Sehubungan dengan itu, Ali juga menzahirkan perasaan dukacitanya dengan tindakan "pelik" Perdana Menteri yang melanggar tradisi memperuntukkan kerusi kabinet kepada Ketua Pemuda Umno.Tindakan luar biasa Presiden UMNO itu memainkan peranan yang boleh di umpamakan oleh ahli-ahli Pemuda sebagai melukut di tepian gantang.


Truth on the Israeli Attack on the Peace Flotilla by neutral sources

Posted: 03 Jun 2010 03:46 AM PDT

Paul McGeough is an award winning journalist, and probably next to Robert Fisk, the most knowledgeable and respected person in that profession on Middle-East affairs. He has interviewed al Qaeda and other groups that won't normally provide interviews to western journalists.

McGeough and an Aussie photographer-journalist Kate Geraghty, both of whom worked for the Sydney Morning Herald (SMH), were among those on the peace flotilla and subsequently imprisoned by Israeli military until international pressure forced the Jewish State to release them.

Incidentally McGeough was the journalist who had to flee Iraq for his own life when in mid-2004 he revealed to the world how US pet and former Iraqi PM, Iyad Allapwi
, had cold-bloodedly executed 6 prisoners, who were nothing more than "suspects", in front of his troops, it was said, to straighten up their (the troops') spines. He shot each and every one of those prisoners as Saddam Hussein had been accused of doing.

For more see my post America the Unfair - America the UnChampion of Democracy and America Maintaining Tradition in Sponsoring Allies.

Well, in the SMH's Freed journos tell of Israeli commandos like 'hyenas hunting' McGeough and Geraghty, who were on another boat (the Challenger) gave us their insight of what happened and how they assessed the conduct of the Israelis, not just at sea but on land as well.

Geraghty said while she was photographing the Israelis boats she was tasered. Shane Dillion, the 1st mate of the Challenger said:

''[Kate Geraghty] was leaning over the side of the boat to take a photograph down of one of the boats approaching us and they blasted her with a Taser.''

Here is a report from a neutral Aussie journalist of being fired at by Israelis without provocation. It goes to debunk the Israeli lies that the protestors were violent. The Israelis have refused to release the entire tapes to international journalists who wanted those rather than edited snips of the videos.


The more likely truth is the Israelis were hellbent on 'punishing' the protestors severely (whether to kill or just injure them, one can't say) in the silly hope of deterring future protestors. Israelis are BIG on deterrence but alas, which nowadays isn't working for them. The Israelis have failed to update themselves with the resolve of a modern opposition.

Extracts of the SMH report follow:

Nine people were killed in the confrontation but Israel maintains that its commandos were attacked by the protesters.
Geraghty believes she was hit by a stun gun fired by Israeli commandos after they boarded her ship. She suffered bruises, minor burns and nausea.

Geraghty said today that she was safe and "very happy" to have been released from detention.

While she had been "frightened" during the confrontation, she said her injuries were "minor" compared with what happened to others on board the boats.

*

His deportation was "an absolute disrespect by Israel" for democracy and the fundamental rights of journalists, McGeough said.

Well. so much for so-called Israeli democracy and freedom of the press.

*

The first mate on the Challenger One, Shane Dillon, called the Israeli raid "an act of piracy".

"It was an attack on a flotilla of peace boats in international waters. It was an act of piracy. The force used was excessive and unwarranted," Mr Dillon told Fairfax after arriving home in Dublin.

Mr Dillon said the mostly female activists on his boat were treated badly -- pushed and hit with rifles, shot in the face with paintball weapons at close range and beaten.

It's known that Israeli soldiers like to beat up or shoot women and children - they had demonstrated that in both Lebanon and Gaza.

And the congregation sent thither twelve thousand men of the valiantest, and commanded them, saying, Go and smite the inhabitants of Jabeshgilead with the edge of the sword, with the women and the children. [Judges 21:10]

If you want more of Israeli atrocities and war crimes, do read my other posts:

(1) Gaza war crimes till unaccounted for

(2) Neo-Nazis perpetuating Holocaust in Gaza


Feel any safer?

Posted: 03 Jun 2010 02:54 AM PDT

Public feel safer, says PM

That's the headline of a story in The Sun today. Najib announced this yesterday during his walkabout in SS2 when he informed that 7,402 policemen have been redeployed from desk jobs to street duties. And he said that this has not only helped to reduce the crime rate but also made the public feel safer.

My question is: How the fuck would he know? Did he ask you? He sure didn't ask me. And then, as he usually does, he really puts his foot in it when he also announced that he was in the area to "get to the ground to see how these efforts are taking off." And if you look at the photo of his walkabout in SS2 yesterday I guess you would feel very safe. The fler was surrounded by policemen and bodyguards.

(from The Sun article) Najib also announced that Selangor will be made the "showcase state" for community policing and that Kuala Lumpur would be turned into a 'police zone' under the new economic order. He did not give details and senior police officers said they were not aware of the plans. Isn't that just fucking typical of how Najib's administration works? It is almost laughable if it wasn't so fucking tragic.

Oh, and by the way, Najib dressed in a shirt and tie for a walkabout in SS2 Petaling Jaya. Proving once and for all maybe, that he is totally out of touch with reality?

NIAMAH!!!


FREE PRESS SPECIAL: Sand corruption

Posted: 03 Jun 2010 02:11 AM PDT

During the reign of the 'most corrupt' MB Selangor ever had, Datuk Seri Khir Toyo, BN collected about RM22 million in sand levy..

Then came Khalid Ibrahim, promising that if Pakatan were in control, they would rein in the corruption and collect RM100 million in sand levy... good promise huh?

well when they came into power they set up Kumpulan Semesta Sdn Bhd, a monopoly that controls all sand permits in the state..


woohoo hey this sound like a perfect recipe for corruption and abuse of power...

but wa hey the people of Selangor thinks DAP and PKR with PAS sent angels to the state assembly so surely they would simply use the iron fisted monopoly to collect more revenue

in fact they promised RM127 million in sand levy for 2009...



guess how much they collected?

RM5.7 million... a quarter of what the 'most corrupt' MB, Khir Toyo collected

hmm why is it the the 'cleanest' government Selangor ever had cannot match the sand levy collection of the 'most corrupt' MB in Selangor's history?

we are not even talking about how much profit KSSB is contributing to state coffers yet here.. if collection is RM5.7 million and top execs are paid months in bonuses.. how much profit can there be



compare that to the RM22 million collected by the state through the land office under the'most corrupt' MB Selango ever had?

Land office officers did not get huge bonuses, they certainly did not charge the state for being in a 'very hazardous industry'.

At the very least one has to wonder what happened to the shortfall between RM22 million collected by Khir Toyo and RM5.7 million collected by Khalid Ibrahim

did the difference get pocketed by Khalid's brother? was it absorbed by the gangsters that are linked to a certain DAP Exco?


and can you believe that the MB doesn't know what is going on in his state, in one of the key areas he had made an election promise to improve??

He, Khalid Ibrahim who promised to reduce san theft and abuse during the last election now does not know that it is happening??

huh?

who are these people??


Anyway, you certainly would not read about this in the FREE PRESS that is the Opposition Media, some suggest that they practice self-censorship

how about that for a crazy notion


Double Standards for ‘Killers of Innocent Muslims’

Posted: 03 Jun 2010 02:14 AM PDT

On 31 May 2010, Israeli forces caused the deaths of 9 alleged civilian activists under debatable circumstances. The majority or all of the casualties are likely to be Muslims.

Individuals, groups and nations across the world, led by Muslim states, rose up to condemn the actions taken by Israel.

Meanwhile, during the three days from 28-30 May 2010, elsewhere in the world, militants claiming to be carrying out the will of Allah killed 12 Muslim civilians.

In the whole month of May 2010, self-proclaimed mujahideen killed 715 people, again the vast majority of them Muslims… Just as they have been doing EVERY SINGLE DAY for the past ten years and more.

Yet when was the last time you heard of any major leaders or scholars condemning this constant genocide against innocent civilians – who are in all likelihood 98% Muslims?

Where are all the Muslim states rising up to correct these misguided jihadists and tell them that Islam definitely does not teach that killing is the way to paradise – and that Islam definitely definitely does not teach that killing Muslims is the way to paradise?

I dare suggest that the alacrity shown in condeming Israel – and simultaneously the apathy shown in condemning fellow Muslims – brings us to the conclusion that the only thing that matters is Muslim or non-Muslim. Whatever nonsense or half-hearted excuses they spout, that it the true bottom line.

(Just as how certain parties continually excoriate Bush for invading Iraq, even though Saddam and the UN sanctions killed far, far more Muslims than Bush did, even though the majority of Iraqis killed during the US invasion were victims of Muslim insurgents, and even though more than 750,000 Iraqi Muslim lives have been saved since Bush's invasion.)

They would rather burn Israel flags and ban Facebook for allowing certain drawings to be posted than bother convincing their misguided brethren to stop killing dozens or hundreds of Muslims daily.



HKL doc: No injuries, but there was penetration

Posted: 03 Jun 2010 01:07 AM PDT

Anwar claims he was meeting with people in the unit next to the one where Saiful had testified that the opposition leader propositioned him for sex after he delivered a document. www.malaysiakini.com
Views: 22
0 ratings
Time: 04:01 More in News & Politics


Fitrah Perjuangan dan Nasi Kerabu

Posted: 26 May 2010 11:17 PM PDT

Minggu lepas saya ke Kelantan untuk turut bersama ke Kongres Parti KeADILan Rakyat yang ke-6 di Kota Bharu, 26 Mei dan 27 Mei 2010.

Sambil mengingati dan menghayati ucapan Presiden yang mengungkap sirah Rasulullah yang menjadi pedoman bagi kita sekarang, sempat juga berehat dan menikmati nasi kerabu dan ikan bakar!

President juga menyuarakan beberapa perkara penting yang perlu disarankan : Fahamilah kepercayaan yg diberi oleh Rakyat kepada kerajaan PR adalah bersyarat dan demokrasi menjadi kewajipan apabila melihat kecenderungan manusia melakukan kezaliman.


'Pray before you are prayed upon' by Abdur Raheem Green, Da'ee of Allah Azza Wa Jalla

Posted: 02 Jun 2010 11:53 PM PDT

Assalamualaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh.

Beloved brothers and sisters in Islam,

Please join me in watching these series of lectures by one of the Islamic world's notable Da'ee's of Allah, Brother Syaikh Abdur Raheem Green, a brilliant articulate Caller to Islam speaking about the importance of solat @ prayer in our lives here on Earth.
abdur raheem green-1.jpg
Source of image







Solat is the very first matter that will be asked of us in the hereafter. It is the key which decides our final destination in the Yaum al Akhirat?

Keep up with our prayer. Without it we will be lost.

Na'uzubillahiminzalik!


This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

No comments: