Tuesday, May 11, 2010

Prosecution IS LICKING DRY ROSMA’S PUSSY it was the discretion of the Attorney-General, as the prosecutor, to charge any person under any section.

Prosecution IS LICKING DRY ROSMA’S PUSSY it was the discretion of the Attorney-General, as the prosecutor, to charge any person under any section.


Prosecution IS LICKING DRY ROSMA’S PUSSY it was the discretion of the Attorney-General, as the prosecutor, to charge any person under any section.

Posted: 11 May 2010 03:49 PM PDT


Dr Chua Soi Lek and woman getting ready for annal sex why was he not arrested for anal sex bloody barisan musa hassan

Solicitor-General II Mohamed Yusof Zainal Abidin, who led the prosecution team, replied that it was the discretion of the Attorney-General, as the prosecutor, to charge any person under any section.
black eye1

The scope of the Attorney-General's powers in Malaysia has long been a subject of debate and controversy. He is the chief legal adviser to the government and is responsible for advising ministers involved in legal proceedings in their official capacity related article why Gani Patail high ranking officier AG office was not CHARGE for not reporting the crime this is the blunt misuse of power by the B.N'S NAJIB'S SMS

. Fabrication is one of his specialities. Have you read the Unholy Trinity related article it's mindboggling!Public Prosecutor has deceptively merely manufacturing evidences against Anwar

Anwar Ibrahim's sodomy trial has been adjourned to tomorrow after the defence raised discrepancies over the charges framed and accuser Mohamad Saiful Bukhari Azlan's testimony yesterday Remember that infamous judge from Sodomy 1 ? The lawyers want the law to be applied in this trial? Don't the lawyers know what happen in sodomy 1 ? And what do you think will happen in sodomy 2 ? Correct Anwar will go to jail! All the lawyers can do is prolong the case.If that bugger Augustine Paul was still alive and the judge for the case, he would say it is irrelevant whether there is consent or not. In buggery , consent or not , it is still buggery the learned judge would declare. As long as Anwar does it , it does not matter who he sticks it to whether it is Saiful or Azizan. The time or the place is all irrelevant as far as the case of sodomy is concerned. Anwar did it before. Anwar did it again. Anwar will do it again, and again and again till he can't get it up. Then the saga ends. Stupid lawyers and judges are sodomising the courts of justice in this country.


[mob1900_sodomyII.jpg]
As a matter of national shame
A traitor is a traitor, with or without a uniform.


.

Raja Petra KamarudinThe following police report was made at 5.45 pm on Saturday, 28 June 2008,
by Mohd Saiful Bukhari Bin Azlan (IC no: 850706-01-5687), who turned 23 last
month:
Saya, Mohd Saiful Bukhari b Azlan, ingin melaporkan bahawa saya telah
diliwat oleh majikan saya. Perkara ini berlaku tanpa kerelaan saya. Kejadian
terakhir berlaku 26/6/08 di Unit 1151, Kondominium Desa Damansara, Jln Setia
Kasih, KL. Oleh itu, tujuan laporan ini dibuat untuk mendapat pembelaan dan
keadilan keatas diri saya. Saya juga berasa bimbang dengan keselamatan diri
dan keluarga saya jika perkara ini tersebar luas di khalayak ramai. Majikan
saya Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim – Ketua Umum PKR.
Yes, that police report was made at 5.45 pm on Saturday, 28 June 2008. By
why did it take that long for Saiful to make his police report? Let us
retrace the steps that led to this police report.

At 2.30pm on Wednesday, 25 June 2008, Saiful met Senior Assistant
Commissioner (SAC) II Mohd Rodwan Mohd Yusof in room 619 of the Concorde
Hotel in Kuala Lumpur. Prior to this secret meeting, Rodwan and Saiful spoke
on the phone at least eight (8) times.

In fact, they can't really remember how many phone calls it was. They say it
was at least eight times although it could have been maybe ten or twelve
times. But who's counting anyway? Eight, ten or twelve doesn't really
matter. The crux of the matter is: they spoke over the phone many times
prior to meeting up in room 619 of the Concorde Hotel — a 'secret' meeting
that can't be very secret if Malaysia Today knows about it.

We must remember one thing. Rodwan is the same police officer who was
involved in fabricating the 1998 sodomy allegation against Anwar. Rodwan was
implicated as the man who illegally took Anwar's specimens, which
subsequently mysteriously reappeared as 'stains' on a mattress. It was so
apparent the mattress was planted as evidence the judge subsequently
rejected the mattress as evidence and ordered that all references of it be
expunged from the court records.

That was all it took. When they realised that the mattress was hurting more
than helping their case, they threw the mattress out of the court and
deleted all records of it ever appearing in court. And, all of a sudden, the
mattress no longer existed. It vanished into thin air. It 'never appeared'
in court although for weeks it was paraded in and out of court for the whole
world to witness.

This is what lawyer and Parliamentarian Sivarasa Rasiah had to say about the
matter:

"In 1998-1999 trials, Anwar experienced the phenomenon of fabrication of DNA
evidence. We had SAC Rodwan illegally removing DNA samples from forensic
custody. In cross-examination of the prosecution's witnesses it was exposed
that DNA taken from blood samples was planted on the infamous mattress."

"When confronted with this fact the prosecution amended its charge and
persuaded the judge, Augustine Paul, to expunge the entire DNA evidence from
the record, preventing Anwar's lawyers from responding."

There were, in fact, other so-called 'damaging evidence' that they created
against Anwar to convince the public that he is indeed guilty of sodomy. In
time, Malaysia Today will parade these witnesses and reveal this evidence to
demonstrate to the public that the slime-ball IGP and scumbag AG, plus their
slithery minion, Rodwan, fixed Anwar's ass good and proper (pun intended).

Now, Rodwan met Saiful three days earlier and these two exchanged at least
eight phone calls. Nevertheless, no police report was made until Saiful had
visited two hospitals — three days later. Why engage in eight phone calls
and have a secret meeting with Rodwan in a hotel room, and only after visits
to two hospitals does Saiful make his police report?

Let us look at the timeline again.

1) Saiful and Rodwan speak over the phone at least eight times over a few
days.
2) At 2.30pm on 25 June 2008, Saiful and Rodwan meet in room 619 of the
Concorde Hotel in Kuala Lumpur.
3) On 26 June 2008, Saiful's ass allegedly gets 'raped' by Anwar.
4) At 2.00pm on 28 June 2008, Saiful goes to Pusat Rawatan Islam
(Pusrawi, a 'halal' hospital) to complain that he can't ***. He tells the
doctor he can't *** because someone buggered his *** — whereas that
would instead have made it easier for him to ***.
5) The doctor peeps into Saiful's *** and discovers that his ***
is still as virgin as Raja Petra Kamarudin's.
6) The doctor then suggests, for purposes of the police report, he goes
to a government hospital for a second opinion.
7) However, instead of getting a second opinion, Saiful goes to the
pondok polis at the hospital to lodge a police report. Sources in Hospital
Kuala Lumpur (HKL) say that no second medical examination was done whereas
the police say it was. Considering that the police report was made within an
hour or two after Saiful left the first hospital, it is highly likely the
hospital is telling the truth while the police are lying.

It must be noted that Saiful met the police BEFORE the so-called sodomy act
took place. The sodomy was supposed to have happened on 26 June while Saiful
met the police on 25 June. And it was not until 28 June that he went to
hospital and made the police report a couple of hours later. And all this
culminated not only after the secret meeting in the hotel room on 25 June
but after eight phone calls as well.

If Saiful was sodomised, would he not tell Rodwan about it during the secret
meeting in room 619 of the Concorde Hotel on 25 June 2008? And why in the
first place did they meet in secret in room 619 of the Concorde Hotel on 25
June 2008? Should they not be meeting in a police station or in the police
headquarters? And, most important of all, would you not want to meet the
police AFTER instead of before the so-called sodomy took place (never mind
whether the meeting is in secret in a hotel room or conducted the right way,
in a police station)?

Would anyone in his or her right mind believe this latest sodomy allegation?
Okay, I said 'right mind'. Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi wants the
police to charge Anwar while the Cabinet is against it. The Cabinet feels
there is no evidence, not only to convict Anwar, but even to charge him in
the first place. But Abdullah wants the police to pursue the case and to
charge Anwar. As I said, no one in his right mind would believe the
allegation against Anwar but then Abdullah is not a person known to be in
his right mind.

And why does Abdullah want so much for the police to charge Anwar? Simple:
because his Deputy, Najib Tun Razak, would invariably get dragged into this
whole mess. The police have recorded both Najib's and his wife's statements
under Section 112. So that means Najib and Rosmah would both have to take
the witness stand to testify during the course of the trial. Once that
happens, everything will flow freely like *** through an *** that's
been sodomised.

During the course of Anwar's impending trial, Malaysians will be told of the
link Saiful has with Mumtaz Jaafar. Malaysians will also be told who Mumtaz
Jaafar is and what her 'special' links with Rosmah are. Further to that,
Malaysians will be told about the relationship between Najib's Special
Officer, Khairul Anas, and Saiful — and the less than manly reputation
these two buggers had while still in school. Yes, the excitement and kinky
sex that is going to spill over from this trial will cause Astro to lose a
lot of business.

The Anwar sodomy trial will hurt Najib more than it will hurt Anwar. At the
end of the trial the court will declare that there is not enough evidence to
secure a conviction. It will be a long five or six years but eventually
Anwar will be free. However, during the course of the five- to six-year
trial, Anwar will have to sit in jail because he will be denied bail. Yes,
Anwar will be free in the end, but only after spending five to six years in
jail without bail.


Must adjourn …have to ask "Boss Rosma" the next step what to do, cos his got no balls to give out justice fairly & squarely. Maybe even kentut also must ask "Boss ROSMA" can or not…
If the purpose of admitting an out-of-court statement is to prove the truth of its contents then it would fall foul of the common law rule against hearsay. The maker of that statement has to be present in court. Even then it is not the out-of-court statement that is the evidence but the testimony of the witness (maker of the statement).

If the purpose is not to prove the truth of its contents, then it is not hearsay. You may have made an out-court-statement to the police (witness statement) which is inconsistent with your testimony in court and counsel wants to admit that statement into court to prove inconsistency, he may do so. It is not hearsay.In a trial involving sexual offences like rape, the credibility of the accuser is key. If, for example, the victim of the offence had taken four days to report the offence to the police, it casts doubt on the allegation that the sex was forced and not consensual. Rape is defined as penetration without consent. Failure to make a report immediately is not proof that the rape was not committed. It only goes to consent but in a case involving sodomy of course consent is irrelevant. Credibility of the accuser is still key.


Sexual crimes like rape by their nature rarely involve eye witnesses. The credibility of the accuser then becomes key in the defense of the witness. As a general rule character evidence is inadmissible. But if your counsel introduces character evidence then that leaves open for the opposing counsel to call character witnesses to rebut the allegations made against his or her client.


Anwar Ibrahim is not charged under syariah law and the court the blog host attended was not a syariah court. Why then the references to the Koran and the requirements of four eye witnesses etc?


Prosecution IS LICKING DRY ROSMA'S PUSSY

by Din Merican

a branch of legal studies called "Critical Legal Studies"
(inspired by Marxism).
We have come up with a Made-in-Malaysia branch called
"Creative Legal Studies" (inspired by UMNO).

John Yoo should use Malaysian examples of "Creative Legal Studies" such as this Saiful case and the Altantunya case in his
lectures at U of California, Berkeley law school.

I can't say whether DSAI is guilty, but I am sure that:

1. a rape victim will not go into the bathroom as instructed, clean himself, and come out from the bathroom wearing towel. (I think most people will fight the raper off, or just go into the bathroom and lock themselves in it, or try to run out of that house..)

2. the first thing rape victim will normally do is clean themselves because they will feel dirty of the whole act (not waiting for 3 days with the "dirty liquid" in your a*s and even go to the masjid with it!!!!!)Karpal is a seasoned trial lawyer and very clear that the whole case rest upon Saiful Bukhari. Only Saiful knew who and what was shoved up his dirty arse hole. According to the medical report, there was no sign of penetration and Saiful initially claimed it was a plastic bottle. Since Saiful has taken the moral high ground to make an Islamic Oath, he must be tested according to that Islamic yardstick. That's what Karpal did and suceeded – that if the incident did happen, Saiful the Liar who tries to appear "warak" by performing Friday prayer had actually performed an invalid prayer because he was in a state of impurity. Indeed he was and indeed he is a LIAR that God had warned will be obliterated from the face of this earth!

That compulsive Liar even tries to charade as a pious person by the two black marks that he scratched on his forehead to give that mark of perpetual prostration (tanda sujud di kepala) for his court appearance. It is amazing the theatrics that he puts on, he deserves an Oscar for this performance.

This dirty arsehole story demeans and is a stain on the whole Malay race! especially when you dont even know me. so Ilham dont call anyone stupid it is againt the Laws espoused in the qur'an ok. It is commanded even the most ignorant ones you must have time for them and educate them and discourse with all in a respectful manner ok. dont do it again. tak baik.

for carlos's": fair question. I really have to find it. I was referring to having witnessess to a sexual misconduct. in the Miralce of the Qur'an. sexual misconduct has to have 4 witnesess . The Qur'an expressly states an affair outside marriage. for a serious sexual misconduc allegation Allah commands four witnessess to guard against false allegations and wrongdoings against another person and defaming his otherwise good character with ordinary people and wrongly doing so. So I was really thinking of that when I said that. I will do my research. However in this sad case here, it is an allegation of sexual misconduct albeit of the worst kind most frowned upon and unnatural act ( thats about as far as I would go in mentioning it without saying the actual word because I cannot stomachh doing so) and therefore would require the same strict demand by teh Qur'an witnesees to make sure that we do not prosecute wrongly, unfairly and in criminal law beyond reasonable doubt that Anwar has actually perpertrated the said act. Now back to my comment and this is the reason WHY I believe in my heart that the miracle of the Qur'an is also sent from the realm of beyond to guide humans in code of conduct,to live in honor and when judging someone in the courts of Man the laws of man that we do not err and destroy an otherwise innocent persons character and defame him or her. that is why I believe that teh miracle of the Qur'an is also the most comprehensive LEGAL Document of fairness and justice sent to this physical world because God knows the heart of men and the greed of men. and how it can destroy all in its path.


Yesterday, the road to the Courts' Complex in Jalan Duta was choked. Security was very tight. Entry into the courts was heavily screened as the trial of Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim (DSAI) in Sodomy II started. This is a repeat of the self inflicted embarrassment and humiliation that we, Malaysians, suffered in 1999 as a nation pre-occupied with unnatural sex. We were made out to be like the people of ancient Sodom that God obliterated from the face of the earth.‬

Liwat (Anal Sex)

People of my generation, more so the Malays, have difficulty using the word "anal sex". There is no Malay equivalent for that word. Being ever so polite and gentle, the Malay word for that is "liwat". It is derived from the root word "excess/excessive", as a description of an excessive sex beyond the norms. Even the official dictionary, the Kamus Dewan 1984 version published by Dewan Bahasa could only muster enough courage to define "liwat" as "bersetubuh dengan binatang".

The Malays could not say "fornicate", what more to describe the abomination of "anal sex" as "main buntut". The Indonesians are somewhat a bit more forthright and very open. In their Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia of the 1995 Edition, "liwat" is described as " persetubuhan sesama lelaki". The point is that- to the Malays, "liwat" is an animalistic act.‬

And yet, in Sodomy I, the Malays have been internationally scandalised as an animalistic society. Why do I say that? Because, Sodomy I involved the highest strata of Malay society- the Malay (UMNO) Leadership. The charge was brought by a Malay(?) Prime Minister against a Malay Deputy Prime Minister. The alleged victim is a Malay. All the key actors, from the witnesses to the prosecutors and the judges (with one exception the Late Augustine "Not Relevant" Paul) are all Malays. The moral of the Malay society was dragged to its lowest ebb. Even Niccolo Machiavelli of Florence could not be more proud.

If there is anything to redeem Sodomy I, it is the fact that the victim, Azizan Abu Bakar, appeared rather coy, almost like a reluctant performer. Sodomy II, on the other hand, blows the mind away. Here, we have Mohd Saiful Bukhairy Azlan almost proud to claim that his backside was diddled with. When the medical report did not support his story, he went to a mosque in Jalan Duta to make an Islamic Oath under the glare of the tv cameras.

Saiful was intent on having his day in court to show how DSAI could overpower him to have a taste of his backside. In the various press conferences that Saiful Bukhary gave, the mainstream media attempted to make him look like a martyr, like a man seeking justice. And justice for what? For proclaiming to the world that his arse hole was poked!

Saiful's Day in Court with Karpal Singh

Yesterday and for the next few days, it will be Saiful's day in court. The day that he exposes the truth in order to seek his justice. But already on the first day of trial, all did not seem well for the prosecution. Saiful met his first test when the contemporaneous evidence in the form of the medical report made on July 28, 2008 at 2pm could not support his story that his arse was buggered. So Saiful took the most convenient suggestion made by Karpal Singh, he accused the Pusrawi Hospital doctor of lying. He accused the doctor of lying for stating that his anus hurt because a plastic instrument had been inserted into it. The next few days will see him accusing a lot more people just to prove that he was indeed buggered.

What is so pitiful is that PM Najib is implicated in this. Saiful has already admitted that just two days before the alleged sodomy, PM Najib had met Saiful. And the person who brought Saiful to meet the PM was none other than Najib's Personal Assistant, Dato' Prof Dr Anas. Just ask about anyone in the PM's Department, and they will tell you what they know of Prof Anas's sexual orientation! If the Sikhs (we call them Bai's) were previously unfairly disparaged for this, in the spirit of 1Malaysia, the Malays too are now filling up this quota, a legacy of the NEP.

And Saiful Bukhairy is the kind of witness that AG Gani relies on to form a case against DSAI. Did anyone die? Was anyone blown to pieces? Yet, when it came to Razak Baginda, the central figure in the Altantuya murder, AG Gani was quick to say no evidence to proceed against Razak. Razak has since run away from Malaysian shores, hoping that the public would soon forget him. What is so unfortunate is that the PM Najib is implicated in both these crimes.

In the Razak Baginda Altantuya murder case, PM Najib's security escort, the Unit Tindakan Khas (UTK) was involved. While in Sodomy II, PM Najib's PA, Dr Anas, is responsible for bringing forth Saiful to be the protagonist. In the Altantuya case, AG Gani tries to bury (or blow up) the evidence, while in Sodmomy II, AG Gani is trying to dig (korek) the evidence. AG Gani sure knows his priorities!‬

Rosli Dahlan's Case: Kevin's "Tak Tahu, Tak Tahu" makes Malaysian Legal History

I was in court for DSAI's case and also to hear the ruling in the Rosli Dahlan's Trial which I have been reporting last week. Day 2 and 3 of Rosli's trial were taken off when MACC DPP Zulqarnain persistently tried to divert and delay the trial after MACC Deputy Director of Prosecution, Anthony Kevin Morais, was caught lying countless times during cross examination. His "Tak Tahu, Tak Tahu, Tak Tahu" evasive replies will now be etched in stone of the legal annals just as the infamous quote from VK Lingam's "Correct, Correct, Correct" video. Only that Kevin's video will be official as it is in the Court's electronic recording system!‬

It is indeed an irony that in DSAI's case, we have Saiful Bukhary, a physically able bodied young man, who eagerly took to swearing an Islamic Oath in order to get DSAI charged for burggering his backside. While in Rosli Dahlan's trial, we have a known Pondan witness in the form of MACC's DPP Kevin Morais giving false evidence in order to convict Rosli. Kevin broke all the rules of his Catholic upbringing, as set out in the Ten Commandments, when he lied through his teeth and was evasive when cornered during cross examination. Kevin was assisted by an Islamic University law graduate (IIU), in the form of DPP Zulqarnain, who resorted to all the dirty ploys to divert and delay Rosli Dahlan's trial. It appears that religion is just a tool for people like these. ‬

Law of Evidence 101

That DPP Zulqarnaian was so desperate to scuttle the Trial was so evident when he made rambling unending legal submissions that certain evidence that were already produced in Dato Ramli's trial can be automatically admitted and marked in Rosli Dahlan's trial without the "maker" being called to tender that evidence. This was Law of Evidence 101, the stuff that even a first year law student would know.

The basic rule of evidence is that a documentary evidence can only be admitted if the maker is called to tender and explain the document. What DPP Zulqarnain was trying to do was to admit certain questionable evidence into Rosli Dahlan's trial without the maker being called or cross examined. That was how desperate the MACC was. It was an attempt by the MACC to admit evidence by the back door- "Main Belakang".‬

Fortunately, Judge Abu Bakar Katar, would have none of this backdoor entry or any "Main Belakang". Previously, the Judge had made two rulings in Rosli's favour. Now, for the 3rd time, the Judge again ruled in Rosli's favour that MACC DPP Zulqarnain must adduce documentary evidence through the maker, by the front door as most straight people would! ‬

Posted by the taxidriver786 at 3:04 PM 0 comments Links to this post


Prosecution IS LICKING DRY ROSMA’S PUSSY it was the discretion of the Attorney-General, as the prosecutor, to charge any person under any section.

Posted: 11 May 2010 03:39 PM PDT

Dr Chua Soi Lek and woman getting ready for annal sex why was he not arrested for anal sex bloody barisan musa hassan

Solicitor-General II Mohamed Yusof Zainal Abidin, who led the prosecution team, replied that it was the discretion of the Attorney-General, as the prosecutor, to charge any person under any section.
black eye1
The scope of the Attorney-General's powers in Malaysia has long been a subject of debate and controversy. He is the chief legal adviser to the government and is responsible for advising ministers involved in legal proceedings in their official capacity related article why Gani Patail high ranking officier AG office was not CHARGE for not reporting the crime this is the blunt misuse of power by the B.N'S NAJIB'S SMS
. Fabrication is one of his specialities. Have you read the Unholy Trinity related article it's mindboggling!Public Prosecutor has deceptively merely manufacturing evidences against Anwar
Anwar Ibrahim's sodomy trial has been adjourned to tomorrow after the defence raised discrepancies over the charges framed and accuser Mohamad Saiful Bukhari Azlan's testimony yesterday Remember that infamous judge from Sodomy 1 ? The lawyers want the law to be applied in this trial? Don't the lawyers know what happen in sodomy 1 ? And what do you think will happen in sodomy 2 ? Correct Anwar will go to jail! All the lawyers can do is prolong the case.If that bugger Augustine Paul was still alive and the judge for the case, he would say it is irrelevant whether there is consent or not. In buggery , consent or not , it is still buggery the learned judge would declare. As long as Anwar does it , it does not matter who he sticks it to whether it is Saiful or Azizan. The time or the place is all irrelevant as far as the case of sodomy is concerned. Anwar did it before. Anwar did it again. Anwar will do it again, and again and again till he can't get it up. Then the saga ends. Stupid lawyers and judges are sodomising the courts of justice in this country.

[mob1900_sodomyII.jpg]
As a matter of national shame
A traitor is a traitor, with or without a uniform.
.

Raja Petra KamarudinThe following police report was made at 5.45 pm on Saturday, 28 June 2008,
by Mohd Saiful Bukhari Bin Azlan (IC no: 850706-01-5687), who turned 23 last
month: Saya, Mohd Saiful Bukhari b Azlan, ingin melaporkan bahawa saya telah
diliwat oleh majikan saya. Perkara ini berlaku tanpa kerelaan saya. Kejadian
terakhir berlaku 26/6/08 di Unit 1151, Kondominium Desa Damansara, Jln Setia
Kasih, KL. Oleh itu, tujuan laporan ini dibuat untuk mendapat pembelaan dan
keadilan keatas diri saya. Saya juga berasa bimbang dengan keselamatan diri
dan keluarga saya jika perkara ini tersebar luas di khalayak ramai. Majikan
saya Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim – Ketua Umum PKR.Yes, that police report was made at 5.45 pm on Saturday, 28 June 2008. By
why did it take that long for Saiful to make his police report? Let us
retrace the steps that led to this police report.

At 2.30pm on Wednesday, 25 June 2008, Saiful met Senior Assistant
Commissioner (SAC) II Mohd Rodwan Mohd Yusof in room 619 of the Concorde
Hotel in Kuala Lumpur. Prior to this secret meeting, Rodwan and Saiful spoke
on the phone at least eight (8) times.

In fact, they can't really remember how many phone calls it was. They say it
was at least eight times although it could have been maybe ten or twelve
times. But who's counting anyway? Eight, ten or twelve doesn't really
matter. The crux of the matter is: they spoke over the phone many times
prior to meeting up in room 619 of the Concorde Hotel — a 'secret' meeting
that can't be very secret if Malaysia Today knows about it.

We must remember one thing. Rodwan is the same police officer who was
involved in fabricating the 1998 sodomy allegation against Anwar. Rodwan was
implicated as the man who illegally took Anwar's specimens, which
subsequently mysteriously reappeared as 'stains' on a mattress. It was so
apparent the mattress was planted as evidence the judge subsequently
rejected the mattress as evidence and ordered that all references of it be
expunged from the court records.

That was all it took. When they realised that the mattress was hurting more
than helping their case, they threw the mattress out of the court and
deleted all records of it ever appearing in court. And, all of a sudden, the
mattress no longer existed. It vanished into thin air. It 'never appeared'
in court although for weeks it was paraded in and out of court for the whole
world to witness.

This is what lawyer and Parliamentarian Sivarasa Rasiah had to say about the
matter:

"In 1998-1999 trials, Anwar experienced the phenomenon of fabrication of DNA
evidence. We had SAC Rodwan illegally removing DNA samples from forensic
custody. In cross-examination of the prosecution's witnesses it was exposed
that DNA taken from blood samples was planted on the infamous mattress."

"When confronted with this fact the prosecution amended its charge and
persuaded the judge, Augustine Paul, to expunge the entire DNA evidence from
the record, preventing Anwar's lawyers from responding."

There were, in fact, other so-called 'damaging evidence' that they created
against Anwar to convince the public that he is indeed guilty of sodomy. In
time, Malaysia Today will parade these witnesses and reveal this evidence to
demonstrate to the public that the slime-ball IGP and scumbag AG, plus their
slithery minion, Rodwan, fixed Anwar's ass good and proper (pun intended).

Now, Rodwan met Saiful three days earlier and these two exchanged at least
eight phone calls. Nevertheless, no police report was made until Saiful had
visited two hospitals — three days later. Why engage in eight phone calls
and have a secret meeting with Rodwan in a hotel room, and only after visits
to two hospitals does Saiful make his police report?

Let us look at the timeline again.

1) Saiful and Rodwan speak over the phone at least eight times over a few
days.
2) At 2.30pm on 25 June 2008, Saiful and Rodwan meet in room 619 of the
Concorde Hotel in Kuala Lumpur.
3) On 26 June 2008, Saiful's ass allegedly gets 'raped' by Anwar.
4) At 2.00pm on 28 June 2008, Saiful goes to Pusat Rawatan Islam
(Pusrawi, a 'halal' hospital) to complain that he can't ***. He tells the
doctor he can't *** because someone buggered his *** — whereas that
would instead have made it easier for him to ***.
5) The doctor peeps into Saiful's *** and discovers that his ***
is still as virgin as Raja Petra Kamarudin's.
6) The doctor then suggests, for purposes of the police report, he goes
to a government hospital for a second opinion.
7) However, instead of getting a second opinion, Saiful goes to the
pondok polis at the hospital to lodge a police report. Sources in Hospital
Kuala Lumpur (HKL) say that no second medical examination was done whereas
the police say it was. Considering that the police report was made within an
hour or two after Saiful left the first hospital, it is highly likely the
hospital is telling the truth while the police are lying.

It must be noted that Saiful met the police BEFORE the so-called sodomy act
took place. The sodomy was supposed to have happened on 26 June while Saiful
met the police on 25 June. And it was not until 28 June that he went to
hospital and made the police report a couple of hours later. And all this
culminated not only after the secret meeting in the hotel room on 25 June
but after eight phone calls as well.

If Saiful was sodomised, would he not tell Rodwan about it during the secret
meeting in room 619 of the Concorde Hotel on 25 June 2008? And why in the
first place did they meet in secret in room 619 of the Concorde Hotel on 25
June 2008? Should they not be meeting in a police station or in the police
headquarters? And, most important of all, would you not want to meet the
police AFTER instead of before the so-called sodomy took place (never mind
whether the meeting is in secret in a hotel room or conducted the right way,
in a police station)?

Would anyone in his or her right mind believe this latest sodomy allegation?
Okay, I said 'right mind'. Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi wants the
police to charge Anwar while the Cabinet is against it. The Cabinet feels
there is no evidence, not only to convict Anwar, but even to charge him in
the first place. But Abdullah wants the police to pursue the case and to
charge Anwar. As I said, no one in his right mind would believe the
allegation against Anwar but then Abdullah is not a person known to be in
his right mind.

And why does Abdullah want so much for the police to charge Anwar? Simple:
because his Deputy, Najib Tun Razak, would invariably get dragged into this
whole mess. The police have recorded both Najib's and his wife's statements
under Section 112. So that means Najib and Rosmah would both have to take
the witness stand to testify during the course of the trial. Once that
happens, everything will flow freely like *** through an *** that's
been sodomised.

During the course of Anwar's impending trial, Malaysians will be told of the
link Saiful has with Mumtaz Jaafar. Malaysians will also be told who Mumtaz
Jaafar is and what her 'special' links with Rosmah are. Further to that,
Malaysians will be told about the relationship between Najib's Special
Officer, Khairul Anas, and Saiful — and the less than manly reputation
these two buggers had while still in school. Yes, the excitement and kinky
sex that is going to spill over from this trial will cause Astro to lose a
lot of business.

The Anwar sodomy trial will hurt Najib more than it will hurt Anwar. At the
end of the trial the court will declare that there is not enough evidence to
secure a conviction. It will be a long five or six years but eventually
Anwar will be free. However, during the course of the five- to six-year
trial, Anwar will have to sit in jail because he will be denied bail. Yes,
Anwar will be free in the end, but only after spending five to six years in
jail without bail.

Must adjourn …have to ask "Boss Rosma" the next step what to do, cos his got no balls to give out justice fairly & squarely. Maybe even kentut also must ask "Boss ROSMA" can or not…

If the purpose of admitting an out-of-court statement is to prove the truth of its contents then it would fall foul of the common law rule against hearsay. The maker of that statement has to be present in court. Even then it is not the out-of-court statement that is the evidence but the testimony of the witness (maker of the statement).

If the purpose is not to prove the truth of its contents, then it is not hearsay. You may have made an out-court-statement to the police (witness statement) which is inconsistent with your testimony in court and counsel wants to admit that statement into court to prove inconsistency, he may do so. It is not hearsay.In a trial involving sexual offences like rape, the credibility of the accuser is key. If, for example, the victim of the offence had taken four days to report the offence to the police, it casts doubt on the allegation that the sex was forced and not consensual. Rape is defined as penetration without consent. Failure to make a report immediately is not proof that the rape was not committed. It only goes to consent but in a case involving sodomy of course consent is irrelevant. Credibility of the accuser is still key.

Sexual crimes like rape by their nature rarely involve eye witnesses. The credibility of the accuser then becomes key in the defense of the witness. As a general rule character evidence is inadmissible. But if your counsel introduces character evidence then that leaves open for the opposing counsel to call character witnesses to rebut the allegations made against his or her client.

Anwar Ibrahim is not charged under syariah law and the court the blog host attended was not a syariah court. Why then the references to the Koran and the requirements of four eye witnesses etc?

Prosecution IS LICKING DRY ROSMA'S PUSSY

by Din Merican

a branch of legal studies called "Critical Legal Studies"
(inspired by Marxism).
We have come up with a Made-in-Malaysia branch called
"Creative Legal Studies" (inspired by UMNO).

John Yoo should use Malaysian examples of "Creative Legal Studies" such as this Saiful case and the Altantunya case in his
lectures at U of California, Berkeley law school.

I can't say whether DSAI is guilty, but I am sure that:

1. a rape victim will not go into the bathroom as instructed, clean himself, and come out from the bathroom wearing towel. (I think most people will fight the raper off, or just go into the bathroom and lock themselves in it, or try to run out of that house..)

2. the first thing rape victim will normally do is clean themselves because they will feel dirty of the whole act (not waiting for 3 days with the "dirty liquid" in your a*s and even go to the masjid with it!!!!!)Karpal is a seasoned trial lawyer and very clear that the whole case rest upon Saiful Bukhari. Only Saiful knew who and what was shoved up his dirty arse hole. According to the medical report, there was no sign of penetration and Saiful initially claimed it was a plastic bottle. Since Saiful has taken the moral high ground to make an Islamic Oath, he must be tested according to that Islamic yardstick. That's what Karpal did and suceeded – that if the incident did happen, Saiful the Liar who tries to appear "warak" by performing Friday prayer had actually performed an invalid prayer because he was in a state of impurity. Indeed he was and indeed he is a LIAR that God had warned will be obliterated from the face of this earth!

That compulsive Liar even tries to charade as a pious person by the two black marks that he scratched on his forehead to give that mark of perpetual prostration (tanda sujud di kepala) for his court appearance. It is amazing the theatrics that he puts on, he deserves an Oscar for this performance.

This dirty arsehole story demeans and is a stain on the whole Malay race! especially when you dont even know me. so Ilham dont call anyone stupid it is againt the Laws espoused in the qur'an ok. It is commanded even the most ignorant ones you must have time for them and educate them and discourse with all in a respectful manner ok. dont do it again. tak baik.

for carlos's": fair question. I really have to find it. I was referring to having witnessess to a sexual misconduct. in the Miralce of the Qur'an. sexual misconduct has to have 4 witnesess . The Qur'an expressly states an affair outside marriage. for a serious sexual misconduc allegation Allah commands four witnessess to guard against false allegations and wrongdoings against another person and defaming his otherwise good character with ordinary people and wrongly doing so. So I was really thinking of that when I said that. I will do my research. However in this sad case here, it is an allegation of sexual misconduct albeit of the worst kind most frowned upon and unnatural act ( thats about as far as I would go in mentioning it without saying the actual word because I cannot stomachh doing so) and therefore would require the same strict demand by teh Qur'an witnesees to make sure that we do not prosecute wrongly, unfairly and in criminal law beyond reasonable doubt that Anwar has actually perpertrated the said act. Now back to my comment and this is the reason WHY I believe in my heart that the miracle of the Qur'an is also sent from the realm of beyond to guide humans in code of conduct,to live in honor and when judging someone in the courts of Man the laws of man that we do not err and destroy an otherwise innocent persons character and defame him or her. that is why I believe that teh miracle of the Qur'an is also the most comprehensive LEGAL Document of fairness and justice sent to this physical world because God knows the heart of men and the greed of men. and how it can destroy all in its path.

Yesterday, the road to the Courts' Complex in Jalan Duta was choked. Security was very tight. Entry into the courts was heavily screened as the trial of Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim (DSAI) in Sodomy II started. This is a repeat of the self inflicted embarrassment and humiliation that we, Malaysians, suffered in 1999 as a nation pre-occupied with unnatural sex. We were made out to be like the people of ancient Sodom that God obliterated from the face of the earth.‬
Liwat (Anal Sex)

People of my generation, more so the Malays, have difficulty using the word "anal sex". There is no Malay equivalent for that word. Being ever so polite and gentle, the Malay word for that is "liwat". It is derived from the root word "excess/excessive", as a description of an excessive sex beyond the norms. Even the official dictionary, the Kamus Dewan 1984 version published by Dewan Bahasa could only muster enough courage to define "liwat" as "bersetubuh dengan binatang".

The Malays could not say "fornicate", what more to describe the abomination of "anal sex" as "main buntut". The Indonesians are somewhat a bit more forthright and very open. In their Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia of the 1995 Edition, "liwat" is described as " persetubuhan sesama lelaki". The point is that- to the Malays, "liwat" is an animalistic act.‬

And yet, in Sodomy I, the Malays have been internationally scandalised as an animalistic society. Why do I say that? Because, Sodomy I involved the highest strata of Malay society- the Malay (UMNO) Leadership. The charge was brought by a Malay(?) Prime Minister against a Malay Deputy Prime Minister. The alleged victim is a Malay. All the key actors, from the witnesses to the prosecutors and the judges (with one exception the Late Augustine "Not Relevant" Paul) are all Malays. The moral of the Malay society was dragged to its lowest ebb. Even Niccolo Machiavelli of Florence could not be more proud.

If there is anything to redeem Sodomy I, it is the fact that the victim, Azizan Abu Bakar, appeared rather coy, almost like a reluctant performer. Sodomy II, on the other hand, blows the mind away. Here, we have Mohd Saiful Bukhairy Azlan almost proud to claim that his backside was diddled with. When the medical report did not support his story, he went to a mosque in Jalan Duta to make an Islamic Oath under the glare of the tv cameras.

Saiful was intent on having his day in court to show how DSAI could overpower him to have a taste of his backside. In the various press conferences that Saiful Bukhary gave, the mainstream media attempted to make him look like a martyr, like a man seeking justice. And justice for what? For proclaiming to the world that his arse hole was poked!

Saiful's Day in Court with Karpal Singh

Yesterday and for the next few days, it will be Saiful's day in court. The day that he exposes the truth in order to seek his justice. But already on the first day of trial, all did not seem well for the prosecution. Saiful met his first test when the contemporaneous evidence in the form of the medical report made on July 28, 2008 at 2pm could not support his story that his arse was buggered. So Saiful took the most convenient suggestion made by Karpal Singh, he accused the Pusrawi Hospital doctor of lying. He accused the doctor of lying for stating that his anus hurt because a plastic instrument had been inserted into it. The next few days will see him accusing a lot more people just to prove that he was indeed buggered.

What is so pitiful is that PM Najib is implicated in this. Saiful has already admitted that just two days before the alleged sodomy, PM Najib had met Saiful. And the person who brought Saiful to meet the PM was none other than Najib's Personal Assistant, Dato' Prof Dr Anas. Just ask about anyone in the PM's Department, and they will tell you what they know of Prof Anas's sexual orientation! If the Sikhs (we call them Bai's) were previously unfairly disparaged for this, in the spirit of 1Malaysia, the Malays too are now filling up this quota, a legacy of the NEP.

And Saiful Bukhairy is the kind of witness that AG Gani relies on to form a case against DSAI. Did anyone die? Was anyone blown to pieces? Yet, when it came to Razak Baginda, the central figure in the Altantuya murder, AG Gani was quick to say no evidence to proceed against Razak. Razak has since run away from Malaysian shores, hoping that the public would soon forget him. What is so unfortunate is that the PM Najib is implicated in both these crimes.

In the Razak Baginda Altantuya murder case, PM Najib's security escort, the Unit Tindakan Khas (UTK) was involved. While in Sodomy II, PM Najib's PA, Dr Anas, is responsible for bringing forth Saiful to be the protagonist. In the Altantuya case, AG Gani tries to bury (or blow up) the evidence, while in Sodmomy II, AG Gani is trying to dig (korek) the evidence. AG Gani sure knows his priorities!‬

Rosli Dahlan's Case: Kevin's "Tak Tahu, Tak Tahu" makes Malaysian Legal History

I was in court for DSAI's case and also to hear the ruling in the Rosli Dahlan's Trial which I have been reporting last week. Day 2 and 3 of Rosli's trial were taken off when MACC DPP Zulqarnain persistently tried to divert and delay the trial after MACC Deputy Director of Prosecution, Anthony Kevin Morais, was caught lying countless times during cross examination. His "Tak Tahu, Tak Tahu, Tak Tahu" evasive replies will now be etched in stone of the legal annals just as the infamous quote from VK Lingam's "Correct, Correct, Correct" video. Only that Kevin's video will be official as it is in the Court's electronic recording system!‬

It is indeed an irony that in DSAI's case, we have Saiful Bukhary, a physically able bodied young man, who eagerly took to swearing an Islamic Oath in order to get DSAI charged for burggering his backside. While in Rosli Dahlan's trial, we have a known Pondan witness in the form of MACC's DPP Kevin Morais giving false evidence in order to convict Rosli. Kevin broke all the rules of his Catholic upbringing, as set out in the Ten Commandments, when he lied through his teeth and was evasive when cornered during cross examination. Kevin was assisted by an Islamic University law graduate (IIU), in the form of DPP Zulqarnain, who resorted to all the dirty ploys to divert and delay Rosli Dahlan's trial. It appears that religion is just a tool for people like these. ‬

Law of Evidence 101

That DPP Zulqarnaian was so desperate to scuttle the Trial was so evident when he made rambling unending legal submissions that certain evidence that were already produced in Dato Ramli's trial can be automatically admitted and marked in Rosli Dahlan's trial without the "maker" being called to tender that evidence. This was Law of Evidence 101, the stuff that even a first year law student would know.

The basic rule of evidence is that a documentary evidence can only be admitted if the maker is called to tender and explain the document. What DPP Zulqarnain was trying to do was to admit certain questionable evidence into Rosli Dahlan's trial without the maker being called or cross examined. That was how desperate the MACC was. It was an attempt by the MACC to admit evidence by the back door- "Main Belakang".‬

Fortunately, Judge Abu Bakar Katar, would have none of this backdoor entry or any "Main Belakang". Previously, the Judge had made two rulings in Rosli's favour. Now, for the 3rd time, the Judge again ruled in Rosli's favour that MACC DPP Zulqarnain must adduce documentary evidence through the maker, by the front door as most straight people would! ‬

Posted by the taxidriver786 at 3:04 PM 0 comments Links to this post


Ezam Soros Sedang Berusaha Membeli Pemimpin-Pemimpin PKR

Posted: 11 May 2010 02:25 PM PDT

Rupa-rupanya di dalam kumpulan Ezam itu ada yang tidak menyukai tindakan Ezam dan memberi maklumat kepada pemimpin-pemimpin PKR.

RM50k bagi setiapKetua-Ketua Cabang (Bahagian atau Kawasan) dan Rm20k bagi Ketua-Ketua AMK. Itulah tawaran wang yang sedang dibuat oleh Ezam Soros kepada pemimpin-pemimpin PKR di peringkat akar umbi sekarang ini.

Saya dapat maklumat Ketua AMK Kelantan pun sudah pun dibeli oleh Ezam dan menunggu masa untuk melompat. Ada beberapa lagi ketua AMK yang sudah mula goyang dan mungkin akan dibeli.

Ezam sedang berusaha untuk membeli seramai mungkin pimpinan2 PKR sebelum Kongress PKR pada 28 May 2010.

Juga, Ezam Soros sedang diberi tugas untuk membeli seorang lagi Ahli Parlimen PKR serta 2 orang ADUN PKR. Kemungkinan besar 2 Adun itu adalah dari negeri Kedah Darul Aman.

Saya ingin mengingatkan para pembaca sekelian terhadap kempen doa laknat terhadap mereka yang terbabit dalam pembelian wakil2 rakyat dan pemimpin2 PKR ini. Doa yang saya cadangkan untuk dibaca dan diaminkan adalah:

" Bismillahirahmanirahim. Ya Allah Ya Tuhan kami. Kami Hamba Mu yang lemah memohon belas ehsan dan kasihan Mu. Kami tidak berdaya untuk menghadapi fitnah wang sebegini besar. Maka, kami berserah kembali kepada kekuasan Mu Ya Allah setelah habis daya dan kederat kami telah digunakan.

Maka, kami memohon, Ya Allah, turunkan Bala yang diterima oleh Kaum Nabi Nuh dan Kaum Nabi Hud ke atas semua yang terlibat dalam usaha pembelian wakil-wakil rakyat serta pimpinan PKR tidak kira siapa mereka itu.

Ya Allah Yang Maha Berkuasa, Yang Menggerakkan Awan, Yang mengalahkan bala tentera Al Ahzab. Hancurkan mereka. Menangkan kami ke atas mereka. Jadikanlah wang mereka sebagai bala ke atas mereka supaya mereka sedar bahawa Kau lebih Berkuasa dari wang mereka.
AMINNNNN"
Inilah contoh politik yang sedang dijaja oleh UMNO. Patutlah agaknya industry judi dan arak disokong oleh puak2 ni. Bayangkan sehari sahaja nilai industri judi di Malaysia adalah RM850 juta (mengikut Mayban Securities). Saya yakin 100% duit judi inilah yang diberikan kepada Ezam Soros untuk menjalankan kempen pembelian beliau.

Raja Petra sendiri pernah mendedahkan dalam blog beliau bagaimana tokeh judi, Vincent Tan telah membeli Timbalan Speaker DUN Perak sehingga membawa kejatuhan kerajaan PR Perak dengan harga RM25 juta.

Mengikut Raja Petra:

Whatever it may be, the thing that prompted her to abandon the party that no longer appreciated her services was the RM25 million that Vincent Tan of Berjaya paid her. Yes, she was paid a cool RM25 million in cash, more money than any Malaysia Today reader will see it many lifetimes.

Kita semua tahu maklumat Raja Petra biasanya betul dan setakat ini tiada siapa yang berani mencabar pendedahan Raja Petra ini.

KENAPA ORANG MELAYU NI MURAH SANGAT UNTUK DIBELI?

Ada ka RM50k boleh melompat. Maklumat saya dapat, Timbalan Speaker Perak Yee telah mencongak segala pendapatan beliau yang bakal beliau hilang sebagai lawyer dan ahli politik untuk 30 tahun ke hadapan bersama-sama kos inflasi. Hasilnya, beliau meminta jumlah RM25juta bagi membeli diri beliau.

Mulanya UMNO tidak setuju kerana terlampau tinggi, tapi apabila Najib tertekan sebab ADUN Bota melompat, pertolongan Vincent Tan telah diminta. Hanya tokeh2 judi dan arak sahaja yang mampu mengeluarkan wang "cash" RM25 juta dalam sekelip mata di Malaysia.

Nilai orang Melayu ni murah sangat. Ada ka dengan Rm20k dan RM50k boleh membiarkan diri dibeli dengan sebegitu mudah? Tak fikir ke maruah diri?

Saya dengar Ahli PArlimen Bagan Serai cuma mendapat RM100k sahaja. Juga, dua ekor ADUN PKR yang melompat di Perak sampai hari ni tak dapat duit mereka secara penuh lagi.

Sebagai orang Melayu yang Islam, soalan saya adalah :

DIMANAKAH MARUAH ORANG MELAYU? MENGAPA BEGITU MURAH HARGA KAMU?

CIA dan MI5 MEMANG SUKA BELI PEMIMPIN

Hari ini, Ezam Soros beli, besok kalau datang CIA, MI6 datang beli, adakah kamu juga akan terbeli? Saya sedang membaca buku bertajuk "Confessions of an Economic Hitman". Mereka telah menyedari selepas jatuhnya Muhammad Al Mossadeq sebagai Perdana Menteri Iran, mereka terpaksa mencari jalan lain. Ini kerana usaha menjatuhkan Mossadeq adalah hasil kerja tangan seorang agen CIA bernama Kermit Roosevelt (cucu Theodore Roosevelt).

Maka, selepas kejatuhan Mohammad Mossadeg, mereka telah berhenti menggunakan agen CIA tetapi mereka menggunakan pula syarikat-syarikat yang ada hubungan dengan CIA.
Secara mudahnya, CIA dan kuncu2 nya telah membeli ahli politik semenjak awal 40an lagi. Mereka telah menjatuhkan kerajaan dan menaikkan kerajaan dengan membeli dan menjual ahli politik.

Kalau Melayu mudah dibeli sebegini, saya tak tau lah apa akan jadi pada masa depan bangsa Melayu dan agama Islam di Malaysia.

Hanya kepada Allah SWT saya bertawakkal. Mungkin ini petanda dekatnya kedatangan Dajjal.
Tulang Besi



Najib..Stop Embarassing the Nation!

Posted: 11 May 2010 10:54 AM PDT

Malaysia is now also known as "Sodomy Country". You just can't imagine the jokes that goes around here in Singapore. Yes, i am in Singapore for a week now and everyday this sodomy is all over the media both in print and on TV as well as a topic over lunch, happy hours and dinner.

There are pages and pages of reports everyday in the foreign press. This is such a bad joke that it is embarassing and to talk about Najib's New Economy Policy which is now the New Sodomy Poke-a-nomy which has Najib written all over it.

The common question is "Why does Najib had to meet Saiful in the middle of the night and were caught than denied about the meeting and than flip flop and Had to admit that he met Saiful."

For goodness sake.. stop all this embarassment and get on with the governance of the country, the world's economy is in turmoil and this asshole publicity will not help with attracting foreign investments.

A comment by a reader in the Singapore Straits Times:

"Najib looks innocent but he is a crafty old fox



Saiful doesn't look innocent and he also looks greedy.



When an innocent-looking PM has a special audience with a not-so-innocent looking commoner, you can be pretty sure nothing innocent will come out from such a meeting.



An unholy plot with a hole-ly agenda......using a backside to target poor Anwar!"

Read Straits Times Singapore HERE.
Read the Sydney Herald HERE
Read Bloomberg's Najib met Saiful HERE


Bekalan Electrik 24 Jam untuk 95 Peratus rumah Luar Bandar 2012…..Jabu talks like Punai After 47 years Even Kuching-Sri Aman not Linked up by electrical Poles

Posted: 11 May 2010 10:36 AM PDT


Menteri Besar Selangor Tan Sri Khalid at Central Market Sibu

Posted: 11 May 2010 10:13 AM PDT


Umno celebrates 64 years

Posted: 11 May 2010 10:04 AM PDT

Prime Minister and Umno president Najib Abdul Razak presides over Umno's 64th birthday at the Putra World Trade Centre this evening. Also present were leaders of the Barisan Nasional component parties. Full story: www.malaysiakini.com
Views: 52
1 ratings
Time: 06:47 More in News & Politics


Vote Wisely between Heaven and Hell...

Posted: 11 May 2010 09:56 AM PDT



While walking down the street one day a Malaysian Boleh Minister is tragically hit by a truck and dies. His soul arrives in heaven and is met by St. Peter at the entrance.

"Welcome to heaven," says St. Peter . "Before you settle in, it seems there is a problem. We seldom see a high official around these parts, you see, so we're not sure what to do with you."

"No problem, just let me in," says the boleh Minister.

"Well, I'd like to, but I have orders from higher up. What we'll do is have you spend one day in hell and one in heaven. Then you can choose where to spend eternity."

"Really, I have made up my mind. I want to be in heaven," says the Yang Berhormat

"I'm sorry, but we have our rules," says St. Peter . And with that, St.Peter escorts him to the elevator and he goes down, down, down to hell. The doors open and he finds himself in the middle of a green golf course. In the distance is a clubhouse and standing in front of it are all his friends and other politicians who had worked with him.

Everyone is very happy and dressed in the finest batik there is. They run to greet him, shake his hand, and reminisce about the good times they had while getting rich at the expense of the people.

They play a friendly game of golf and then indulge themselves on lobsters, caviar and the most expensive food there is. There was music and dancing girls entertaining them all day and night .

Also present is the devil, who really is a very friendly guy who has a good time dancing and telling jokes. They are having such a good time that before he realizes it, it is time to go.

Everyone gives him a hearty farewell and waves while the elevator rises. The elevator goes up, up, up and the door reopens on heaven where St. Peter is waiting for him.

"Now it's time to visit heaven." So, 24 hours pass with the Yang Berhormat joining a group of contented souls moving from cloud to cloud, playing the harp and singing. They have a good time and, before he realizes it, the 24 hours have gone by and St.Peter returns.

"Well, then, you've spent a day in hell and another in heaven. Now choose your eternity."

The Yang Berhormat reflects for a minute, then he answers: "Well, I would never have said it before, I mean heaven has been delightful, but I think I'll be better off in hell."

So St. Peter escorts him to the elevator and he goes down, down, down to hell. Now the doors of the elevator open and he's in the middle of a barren land covered with waste and garbage and shits falling all over.

He sees all his friends, dressed in rags, picking up the garbage and shits and putting it in black bags as more garbage falls from above. The devil comes over to him and puts his arm around his shoulder.

"I don't understand," stammers the Yang Berhormat. "Yesterday I was here and there was a golf course and clubhouse, and we ate lobster and caviar, drank champagne, and danced and had a great time.. Now there's just a wasteland full of garbage and my friends look miserable. What happened?"

The devil looks at him, smiles and says, "Yesterday we were campaigning."

"Today you voted."


Survey all NCR Land, NGO (Sadia) urged the Government…..

Posted: 11 May 2010 08:19 AM PDT

0805201010961KUCHING: The Sarawak Dayak Iban Association (Sadia) has urged the government to survey all native customary rights (NCR) lands if it wants to solve the NCR land problems, which are causing great misery and threatening the livelihood of the natives.Sadia secretary-general Nicholas Mujah said: "The state government should follow the advice of the Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Idris Jala, who has recommended that all NCR lands be surveyed and be given titles.

"Jala is echoing the recommendation made by AJN Richards in his Land Report of 1962.

"If all the NCR lands are surveyed and given titles, then the issues concerning the NCR lands will be solved.

"At present, the problems have got out of hand and are causing great misery and threatening the livelihood of the natives," said Mujah when asked to comment on Chief Minister Taib Mahmud's statement.

Taib has accused a small group of disgruntled people of instigating a protest against the government's land policy.

Taib said these irresponsible people were inclined to use small problems to instigate the people to go against the government to create political upheaval.

"The people should not listen to them, otherwise they would fall prey to their irresponsible deeds," he said.

The chief minister had also revealed that the Department of Land and Surveys had created more than 188,000 titles for native customary lands.

"As such, it was wrong and misleading for a group of disgruntled sawmill people to instigate our people to protest against the government's land policy," he had reportedly said.

'Landowners prepared to go to jail'

Mujah did not dispute that the government had issued land titles, but what he knew was that the government issued land titles only for plots of land where the people built their houses.

"The house owners are given TOL (temporary occupation licence) after the surroundings of their houses have been surveyed and this is what the government has been shouting about giving titles to NCR lands.

"Certainly not the NCR lands per se; otherwise how can they explain the hundreds of NCR land cases before the court?

"The landowners have sued the government and companies for taking away their untitled NCR land. So far, the natives have won almost all of the cases that have been decided by the court," Mujah said.

He also queried the government on the existence of a Land and Survey Department circular directing that no further titles be issued on NCR lands.

The directive was given after Sarawak Land Custody and Rehabilitation Authority had been issuing land titles to scheme participants in the 1990s.

"If the government is sincere, it should revoke the circular and start surveying all NCR lands and ensure the lands are given titles," said Mujah.

He added that the landowners would continue to defend their rights and they have no fear to reveal the truth.

"These people are prepared to go to jail to defend their rights," he added — FMT


Meeting Tuan Polis Chief Bahagian Sri Aman regarding the Blockage made by Kim Loong Berhad, our road to our Rubber Estates. Please dont Treat we Dayak as Animals….We Dayak Iban are Human too, we also have rights to our NCR Land…

Posted: 11 May 2010 07:22 AM PDT


Recolor May 13 - The Sun Daily today

Posted: 11 May 2010 07:36 AM PDT

Recolouring May 13
By ZAKIAH KOYA and KAREN ARUKESAMY


"Two new books attempt to change the way Malaysians view the date, by replacing fear and embracing the shared values that unite them despite their diversity"

KUALA LUMPUR (May 10, 2010): Anas Zubedy was five years old when the May 13 racial riots occurred in 1969. Yet, he remembers clearly his father returning home in a hurry and locking all doors and sitting up all night with a parang.

"I think if anything were to happen to us, I am sure that despite being the only Malay family in the Chinese neighbourhood, our neighbours would have come to our rescue," said Anas, an entrepreneur and trainer.

Anas, together with academician Dr Chandra Muzaffar of International Movement for a Just World (JUST), are on a quest – to recolour May 13 as a day when all Malaysians should learn from their past mistakes and celebrate by embracing the shared values that unite them despite their diversity.

"When we talk about May 13, what comes instantly to mind is the racial riots. We should stop blaming each other for what has happened and learn from our mistakes and talk about the positive side. We can blame others for what happened, or we can choose to transform things for the better, to be change agents and constructively fill our hearts and minds with what needs to be done so May 13 does not ever happen again, and that no one uses the day to bring about fear and negativity," said Anas.

On May 13, 1969, racial riots broke out in Kuala Lumpur, officially leaving 196 dead, leading to a state of national emergency and suspension of Parliament.

To promote unity and spread the positive vibes of May 13, Anas has written a book titled "The Quran and I", chronicling his life story of being raised as a Malaysian Muslim and at the same time growing up with friends of all races and religions.

Chandra's book, "A Plea for Empathy – The Quest for Malaysian Unity", is a compilation of his articles on national unity written over a period of 34 years.

"It is an interesting take that we celebrate May 13 from a different perspective as people will always remember it as a day of racial riots – it is a date associated with the shattering of the fabric of our society," said Chandra.

The book dissects various important issues such as the communal polarisation, ethnicity time bomb, solutions to resolving issues in a multi-religious society and Malay sovereignty.

Chandra said that he hoped with the publication of such a compilation, Malaysians would not only have a deeper understanding of issues pertaining to national unity but also develop empathy for one another.

"I hope books like this would be bridge builders and break the walls that divide us," Chandra said.

A plea to celebrate the day with holding thanksgiving feasts can be read at Anas' blog http://letusaddvalue.blogspot.com/.

The books will be launched on Thursday at Starbucks, Bangsar Village2. -- theSun


Ace of Spades HQ on Biased Media Slant in Presenting ‘Neutral’ News

Posted: 11 May 2010 02:28 AM PDT

Excerpt from <a href="When Bush broke election spending records and opted out of publicly-financed campaign spending, the media excoriated him. Guess how much noise was made when Ace of Spades HQ:

What makes the "Neutral Story Line" not neutral at all is that the media seems most interested, each cycle, in the "Neutral Story Line" that hurts the Republicans more. For instance, the amount of money flowing into elections became a more and more intense problem as more and more money flowed to Republicans, putting Democrats at a disadvantage. The supposedly Neutral Story Line doesn't really seem all that Neutral when you consider that there's-too-much-money-in-politics reached its crisis stage during Bush's 2004 election, when he spent more money than anyone in history, but suddenly wasn't a problem at all when Obama topped him in 2008. This despite the fact that Bush actually had a higher percentage of small-money donors than Obama (as a percentage of total money donated), and Obama had a bigger percentage of high-dollar donors.

The media loves these story lines, because facially they appear neutral — "money in politics is a danger" has no on-its-face, explicit partisan import — but the timing of when to deploy a particular story line is highly partisan, and always made with the Democratic Party's best interests in mind.

Thus, when Bush refused the campaign spending limits, and spent only private money, it was nearly a constitutional crisis; when Obama did the same, it was a triumph of people-powered politics.

Are conspiracy theories bad? Well, right now, when the Republican base is vulnerable to buying into conspiracy theories about Obama's birthplace or sabotaged deep-drilling oil rigs, conspiracy theories are bad, and examples of the Paranoid Style of American Politics.

On the other hand, when former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright confessed to Mort Kondracke she feared Bush had actually captured bin Ladin and was secretly holding him only to publicize his capture on the eve of the 2004 elections, a party's trafficking in conspiracy theories wasn't even worth noting.

Certainly such conspiracy theories weren't worth noting when Bush and Cheney (and their deadly cabal) were accused of sabotaging a plane in order to murder a sitting and popular liberal US Senator.

But consider the case of Sestack and Specter: The media will once again have its choice of two "neutral story lines" when that primary is resolved. It's heads the Democrats win, tails the Republicans lose, as far as the media is concerned.

If Sestack wins, the media will in fact push the "neutral story line" they could have pushed, but chose not to, in Bennet's case: That we're retiring an old warhorse in favor of a fresh face and that proves that our system works.

On the other hand, if Specter wins, they'll push the "neutral story line" that the Democrats, unlike Republicans, are welcoming of moderates.

Are we too interested in personal scandals which don't really have much to do with a party's governing philosophy? The answer is "No" if you mean Mark Foley or Mark Sanford; the answer is "Yes" if you mean Eric Massa or John Edwards.

Is it out of line for a former vice president to toughly criticize a new president of a different party? Well, if you're Al Gore criticizing Bush, you're just being patriotic and expressing the frustrations of millions of Americans. If you're Dick Cheney criticizing Obama, you're deliberately weakening a new president and endangering national security.

Is it patriotic, or treasonous, for a high-level national security staffer to leak to the press? Well, if you're exposing Bush's SWIFT snooping, you're a patriot, keeping a vigilant eye on the shadowy, murky world of espionage. If you're embarrassing Obama by noting that he has no Iran plan at all, you're a dirty leaking traitor giving away critical state secrets for a cheap partisan advantage.

And dissent? Is it the highest form of patriotism or the lowest form of partisanship? I think you know the answer there, and the answer is, of course, It depends on who's dissenting.

See also related: Presidential Double Standards: Bush and Obama Given Different Treatment on Same Issues, Name That Party! MSM Almost Always Omits Mention Democrat Party Affiliation of Convicted Politicians and Who is Violent: Left or Right?.



'Apologise' - Aminulrasyid's family tells cops

Posted: 11 May 2010 04:20 AM PDT

The family of Aminulrasyid Amzah, the teen victim of a fatal police shooting in Shah Alam last month today asked the police for an apology over the incident. "A charge has been brought against one of the police officers involved in the shooting of the deceased under section 304 of the Penal Code... but up to now the authorities, neither the Home Ministry nor the IGP (inspector-general of police), have apologised, said Aminulrasyid's uncle Kamaruddin Hassan who spoke on behalf of the family.
Views: 320
4 ratings
Time: 05:58 More in News & Politics


Sand-and-sex case: PKR MPs want independent body

Posted: 11 May 2010 03:48 AM PDT

Eleven PKR parliamentarians have proposed an independent body to investigate allegations of corruption involving Selangor state-owned Kuala Semesta Sdn Bhd, dubbed as the sand-and-sex scandal. The 11 MPs made the call to pressure Selangor MB Khalid Ibrahim to form an independent panel to probe the case at a meeting in De Palma Hotel in Ampang last night. Following the meeting, Kapar MP S Manikavasagam said he had decided to put off his police report over the matter today.
Views: 325
1 ratings
Time: 03:11 More in News & Politics


Baja BN enda Ngasi agi, enda Pia ba Sibu?

Posted: 11 May 2010 03:22 AM PDT

0805201010871


Dayak Iban in Pantu Balai Ringin were Constantly LOCKED UP by Police in Defending their NCR Land: Message to Sibu Dayak Iban Voters Vote BN out….Your NCRland be Next victims by Lanun Taib and BN Cronies…

Posted: 11 May 2010 03:11 AM PDT


Sibu Drenched in Money……

Posted: 11 May 2010 02:52 AM PDT

By FMT Team

SIBU: It is raining money in Sibu these days and all Pakatan Rakyat can do is watch.

Local newspapers over the last few days have been splashing pictures of mock cheques, smiling recipients and grinning BN leaders.

They bear captions such as 'Chinese primary schools get RM10mil', 'Independent Chinese secondary school gets RM5mil', 'Rm6.5mil for Sarawak small holders' and 'RM200.00/month subsidy for fisher folks' living costs'.

Sibu has never before seen windfalls coming in such rapidity over such a short time, according to a local resident.

Apart from the millions for this and that project, there were generous ang pows passing through the corridors of the long houses and the city streets, he said.

Every visiting federal ministers had been generous, he added.

There are five days to go before for the May 16 by-election, which is a three cornered tussle between BN, Sarawak United People's Party and an independent candidate.

Will the independent Narawi Haron withdraw? The bet is on that he will once the price is right. Chances are the figure will get right soon because BN cannot afford to let him break the Malay-Melanau votes in the expected neck-and-neck race.

Nawawi contested in Sibu in 1995, garnering 925 votes, mainly from the Malay-Melanaus. In the 2006 election, he registered to contest but dropped out before polling day.

Meanwhile the townsfolk expect Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak to bring along with him the largest bag of goodies ever, including a huge amount of money for flood mitigation programmes.

The Chinese are also hoping to hear him give the go-ahead for a local university and more millions for Chinese schools.

Nail-biting finish

Najib's appearance is a much awaited moment. Expectations are high that BN will be spending far more than the RM66 million it blew to wrest the Hulu Selangor parliamentary seat from PKR on April 25.

The locals have drawn a parallel between Hulu Selangor and Sibu.

The BN candidate in Sibu, Robert Lau Hui Yew, is a political novice with good public relations skills, much like the newly elected P Kamalanathan of Hulu Selangor.

Lau will face Sarawak DAP chief Wong Ho Leng who, like PKR Hulu Selangor candidate Zaid Ibrahim, is a well-known lawyer.

Pundits also expect a nail-biting finish in Sibu, a la Hulu Selangor, where BN won by 1,725 votes.

Wong is a veteran politician and has vied for the Sibu seat three times before. In his last outing, he lost to the late Robert Lau by 3,323 votes. It was a three cornered fight between DAP, PKR and BN.

Robert Lau, who is an uncle to the current BN candidate, died on April 9.

The candidates' performance in Sibu will be an indication of their respective parties' chances in the impending state election.


Sultans are constitutional monarchs

Posted: 11 May 2010 03:10 AM PDT

Ironically, as the Islamization of Malaysia moves further forward, where the powers of the Syariah Court is now felt ever more significantly, the Sultans as head of the Islamic religion in a State has lesser powers over religious matters.

That has been the opinion of Professor Aziz Bari. The Malaysian Insider reported Prof Bari …

… added that this was especially true of instances where the Sultan issues a decree on matters already decided upon by the Syariah Court.

"To me that's illegal... The power of the Sultan is more... executive. [That he has] wandered into judicial power — that is not acceptable."

Thanks to people like Zaid Ibrahim, Ragunath Kesavan (Bar Council President) and other law experts like Prof Bari, we can dismiss the attempted claim by the Selangor Islamic Religious Council (MAIS) that the Sultan's decree is law.

It's not. Laws may only be passed by DUNs and Parliaments. Rulers of this nation are only constitutional monarchs. The voice of the people is still supreme.

We must continue our vigilance lest this democracy reverts back to the days of 15th Century Sultan Mansur Shah where he could order anyone killed, or even in more recent times where a caddy was alleged to have been killed.

Though Zaid, Ragunath and Bari have done us a great service in clarifying the laws of this country and thus limiting the powers of a constitutional monarch, they were not original.

That honour must surely belong to Hang Jebat, the greatest warrior for justice, and in more recent times his admirer, Dr Mahathir, whose greatest legacy had been his taming of the Sultans.

It's such a pity that a great hero like Dr M now associates himself with a person like Ibrahim Ali, and will address a mammoth rally in Terengganu to 'awaken the Malay race' on Thursday, May 13, a most significantly black day in the darker history of Malaysia.


Tr Masa Struck Off the NCR Claimed by Kim Lung Berhad Supported Claimants, Tr Nuing of Empaling and others

Posted: 11 May 2010 02:39 AM PDT


Let them compete fair and square !

Posted: 11 May 2010 01:27 AM PDT

One of the wealthiest men in the world is Warren Buffet. He did not make his money by digging oil well; he did not make his money by loan sharking; he did not make his money by dealing with drugs or through other illicit manners. He made his big pile of money by investing– by using his brain.

It is often said that if you want to be a successful investor, you have to follow your brain and not your heart. In other words, you have to be rational and not emotional. I think Warren Buffet did that- a feat easier said than done.

What differentiates him from other rich is that he donates most of his money to charity. He did not stay in a 24 million house in Shah Alam; rather, despite his riches, he has always stayed in the simple house in Omaha , Nebraka since his youth.

This is what is written in Wikipedia about his plan to donate most of his fortune away:

His children will not inherit a significant proportion of his wealth. These actions are consistent with statements he has made in the past indicating his opposition to the transfer of great fortunes from one generation to the next.[94] Buffett once commented, "I want to give my kids just enough so that they would feel that they could do anything, but not so much that they would feel like doing nothing".[95]

In June 2006, he announced a plan to give away his fortune to charity, with 83% of it going to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.[96] He pledged about the equivalent of 10 million Berkshire Hathaway Class B shares to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (worth approximately US$30.7 billion as of 23 June 2006), making it the largest charitable donation in history, and Buffett one of the leaders in thephilanthrocapitalism revolution. The foundation will receive 5% of the total donation on an annualised basis each July, beginning in 2006. Buffett also will join the board of directors of the Gates Foundation, although he does not plan to be actively involved in the foundation's investments

He is one who did not believe in giving lots and lots of fish to his children but rather he believes in giving fish to all those who have no fish to eat, while at the same time, he is satisfied with teaching his children how to fish.

There is an article today in Yahoo about one of his sons, Peter, thanking his father for making him a happy person rather than a spoilt brag (read here). Peter also mentioned that his father had said that those who are born with the silver spoons in their mouth can become victims of  'having silver daggers in their back".

What this means is that we should allow our children to go through tough competition and hardship even if we have the means to give them a very comfortable life. We should allow them to compete fairly and squarely with other kids. We should not spoil them by making their lives too easy.

The same thing must be said of society. Everyone , regardless of colour or creed, must be given a fair and square chance to compete against each other in order to toughen them up and in order to make them useful persons rather than those who depends on handouts.

By not giving his fortune to his children and making his children realise the importance of building their own careers, Warren Buffet shows the greatest love a parent can have for his children.



No comments: